Disorientation inhibits landmark use in 12-18-month-old infants.

Recent research has indicated that, particularly under conditions of inertial disorientation, mammals may be sensitive to landmark configuration geometry at the expense of individual featural information when locating hidden goals. The current study sought to establish whether landmark use could be demonstrated in 12-18-month-old infants with and without a disorientation procedure, and with geometrically ambiguous landmark configurations. A peekaboo paradigm was employed in which infants learned to anticipate a peekaboo event after a cue from two locations within a circular arena, followed by a test trial from a novel position in which no peekaboo occurred after the cue. In all conditions, an isosceles triangle arrangement of landmarks was used, with peekaboo occurring between the landmarks of one of the two equal "sides", thus being geometrically ambiguous. In two conditions, the landmarks were distinctive, and in two further conditions, they were identical. In one of the distinctive conditions and one of the identical landmark conditions, infants underwent a disorientation procedure in between training and test trials. Only oriented infants with distinctive landmarks were successful in test trials, thus suggesting that infants are able to use the individual features of landmarks to locate a goal, but can only do so if oriented.

[1]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[3]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). , 2001 .

[4]  L. Acredolo,et al.  Developmental changes in the effects of landmarks on infant spatial behavior. , 1980 .

[5]  R. Muller,et al.  Failure of Centrally Placed Objects to Control the Firing Fields of Hippocampal Place Cells , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  LANDMARK USE BY NAVIGATING RATS (RATTUS NORVEGICUS) : CONTRASTING GEOMETRIC AND FEATURAL INFORMATION , 1998 .

[7]  R. Muller,et al.  Further study of the control of place cell firing by intra‐apparatus objects , 1999, Hippocampus.

[8]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[9]  J. Taube,et al.  Effects of repeated disorientation on the acquisition of spatial tasks in rats: dissociation between the appetitive radial arm maze and aversive water maze. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  Kathryn J. Jeffery,et al.  The neurobiology of spatial behaviour , 2003 .

[11]  L. Acredolo.  Development of Spatial Orientation in Infancy. , 1978 .

[12]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: Why they fire where they fire , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  E. Save,et al.  Drawing parallels between the behavioural and neural properties of navigation , 2003 .

[15]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  J. Rieser.  Spatial orientation of six-month-old infants. , 1979, Child development.

[17]  The development of beacon use for spatial orientation in 6–8.5-month-old infants , 2000 .

[18]  G. M. Martin,et al.  Spatial disorientation blocks reliable goal location on a plus maze but does not prevent goal location in the Morris maze. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[20]  Adina R. Lew,et al.  Indirect landmark use at 6 months of age in a spatial orientation task. , 2004 .

[21]  R. F. Wang,et al.  Comparative approaches to human navigation , 2003 .

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[23]  R H Day,et al.  Spatial localization in infancy: position constancy in a square and circular room with and without a landmark. , 1986, Child development.

[24]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  The development of relational landmark use in six- to twelve-month-old infants in a spatial orientation task. , 2000, Child development.

[25]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[26]  E. Bushnell,et al.  The spatial coding strategies of one-year-old infants in a locomotor search task. , 1995, Child development.