On Causal Mediation Analysis with a Survival Outcome

Suppose that having established a marginal total effect of a point exposure on a time-to-event outcome, an investigator wishes to decompose this effect into its direct and indirect pathways, also known as natural direct and indirect effects, mediated by a variable known to occur after the exposure and prior to the outcome. This paper proposes a theory of estimation of natural direct and indirect effects in two important semiparametric models for a failure time outcome. The underlying survival model for the marginal total effect and thus for the direct and indirect effects, can either be a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model, or a marginal structural additive hazards model. The proposed theory delivers new estimators for mediation analysis in each of these models, with appealing robustness properties. Specifically, in order to guarantee ignorability with respect to the exposure and mediator variables, the approach, which is multiply robust, allows the investigator to use several flexible working models to adjust for confounding by a large number of pre-exposure variables. Multiple robustness is appealing because it only requires a subset of working models to be correct for consistency; furthermore, the analyst need not know which subset of working models is in fact correct to report valid inferences. Finally, a novel semiparametric sensitivity analysis technique is developed for each of these models, to assess the impact on inference, of a violation of the assumption of ignorability of the mediator.

[1]  C. Blanco,et al.  Causality and Psychopathology: Finding the Determinants of Disorders and Their Cures , 2011 .

[2]  L. Keele,et al.  A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis , 2010, Psychological methods.

[3]  J. Pearl The Mediation Formula: A Guide to the Assessment of Causal Pathways in Nonlinear Models , 2011 .

[4]  J. Robins,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Selection bias and unmeasured Confounding in missing Data and Causal inference models , 2000 .

[5]  Zhiliang Ying,et al.  Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model , 1994 .

[6]  J. Robins,et al.  Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models , 2005, Biometrics.

[7]  A. Tsiatis Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data , 2006 .

[8]  J. Robins,et al.  Alternative Graphical Causal Models and the Identification of Direct E!ects , 2010 .

[9]  Chunming ZhangFebruary Discussion of the Paper by \adjusting for Non-ignorable Drop-out Using Semiparametric Non-response Models" , 2007 .

[10]  J. Robins,et al.  Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers , 1992 .

[11]  Michael Rosenblum,et al.  Marginal Structural Models , 2011 .

[12]  James M. Robins,et al.  Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality , 2003 .

[13]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2009, Epidemiology.

[14]  T. VanderWeele Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect Effects , 2010, Epidemiology.

[15]  Ilya Shpitser,et al.  Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. , 2012, Annals of statistics.