Adaptive quantum state tomography via linear regression estimation: Theory and two-qubit experiment

Adaptive techniques have great potential for wide application in enhancing the precision of quantum parameter estimation. We present an adaptive quantum state tomography protocol for finite dimensional quantum systems and experimentally implement the adaptive tomography protocol on two-qubit systems. In this adaptive quantum state tomography protocol, an adaptive measurement strategy and a recursive linear regression estimation algorithm are performed. Numerical results show that our adaptive quantum state tomography protocol can outperform tomography protocols using mutually unbiased bases and the two-stage mutually unbiased bases adaptive strategy, even with the simplest product measurements. When nonlocal measurements are available, our adaptive quantum state tomography can beat the Gill–Massar bound for a wide range of quantum states with a modest number of copies. We use only the simplest product measurements to implement two-qubit tomography experiments. In the experiments, we use error-compensation techniques to tackle systematic error due to misalignments and imperfection of wave plates, and achieve about a 100-fold reduction of the systematic error. The experimental results demonstrate that the improvement of adaptive quantum state tomography over nonadaptive tomography is significant for states with a high level of purity. Our results also show that this adaptive tomography method is particularly effective for the reconstruction of maximally entangled states, which are important resources in quantum information.Quantum tomography: Adaptivity improves precisionQuantum state tomography is an essential task in the development of quantum technology. The key problem is to find a strategy that has a high level of estimation accuracy and is easy to experimentally implement. A group of international scientists from China and Australia presented, and experimentally tested, such a strategy, called recursively adaptive quantum state tomography (RAQST). In RAQST, no prior assumption on the state is made. Numerical results show that RAQST, even with the simplest product measurements, outperforms other proposed protocols wherein nonlocal measurements are involved. With error-compensation techniques, the authors experimentally demonstrated its superiority for two-qubit optical tomography. RAQST is particularly effective when reconstructing states with high purity, which are important resources in quantum information. Their method offers a new basis for designing effective approaches for determining a quantum state and can be widely used in quantum information experiments.

[1]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Error-compensation measurements on polarization qubits , 2015, 1503.00263.

[2]  Alexei Gilchrist,et al.  Choice of measurement sets in qubit tomography , 2007, 0706.3756.

[3]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Achieving quantum precision limit in adaptive qubit state tomography , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[4]  S. Kulik,et al.  Experimental adaptive quantum tomography of two-qubit states , 2015, 1510.05303.

[5]  Hiroshi Imai,et al.  Experimental demonstration of adaptive quantum state estimation , 2012, 2013 Conference on Lasers & Electro-Optics Europe & International Quantum Electronics Conference CLEO EUROPE/IQEC.

[6]  John A Smolin,et al.  Efficient method for computing the maximum-likelihood quantum state from measurements with additive Gaussian noise. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[7]  Daoyi Dong,et al.  Quantum State Tomography via Linear Regression Estimation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[8]  R. Blume-Kohout Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states , 2006, quant-ph/0611080.

[9]  Masahito Hayashi Asymptotic theory of quantum statistical inference : selected papers , 2005 .

[10]  N. Houlsby,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian quantum tomography , 2011, 1107.0895.

[11]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Measurement of qubits , 2001, quant-ph/0103121.

[12]  R. Gill,et al.  State estimation for large ensembles , 1999, quant-ph/9902063.

[13]  E. Bagan,et al.  Multiple-copy two-state discrimination with individual measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0410097.

[14]  Wiseman,et al.  Adaptive phase measurements of optical modes: Going beyond the marginal Q distribution. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[15]  R. Boyd,et al.  Experimental Realization of Quantum Tomography of Photonic Qudits via Symmetric Informationally Complete Positive Operator-Valued Measures , 2015 .

[16]  Separable measurement estimation of density matrices and its fidelity gap with collective protocols. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[17]  Howard M. Wiseman,et al.  Characterization of a qubit Hamiltonian using adaptive measurements in a fixed basis , 2011, 1102.3700.

[18]  Adam Miranowicz,et al.  Priority Choice Experimental Two-Qubit Tomography: Measuring One by One All Elements of Density Matrices , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Z. Hradil Quantum-state estimation , 1996, quant-ph/9609012.

[20]  Joseph M. Renes,et al.  Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements , 2003, quant-ph/0310075.

[21]  Lei Guo Self-convergence of weighted least-squares with applications to stochastic adaptive control , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[22]  Jaroslaw Adam Miszczak Generating and using truly random quantum states in Mathematica , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[23]  D. Berry,et al.  Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation , 2007, Nature.

[24]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements , 1989 .

[25]  Stephen Becker,et al.  Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[26]  S. Straupe,et al.  Experimental adaptive Bayesian tomography , 2013, 1303.1792.

[27]  Franco Nori,et al.  Optimal two-qubit tomography based on local and global measurements: Maximal robustness against errors as described by condition numbers , 2014, 1409.4622.

[28]  K. Życzkowski,et al.  Random unitary matrices , 1994 .

[29]  Y. S. Teo,et al.  Quantum-state reconstruction by maximizing likelihood and entropy. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[30]  B L Higgins,et al.  Mixed state discrimination using optimal control. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[31]  Takanori Sugiyama,et al.  Adaptive experimental design for one-qubit state estimation with finite data based on a statistical update criterion , 2012, 1203.3391.

[32]  Franco Nori,et al.  Full reconstruction of a 14-qubit state within four hours , 2016, New Journal of Physics.

[33]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View , 2004, quant-ph/0404156.

[34]  G. D’Ariano,et al.  Optimal quantum tomography of States, measurements, and transformations. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[35]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Adaptive quantum state tomography improves accuracy quadratically. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[36]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Improving quantum state estimation with mutually unbiased bases. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[37]  M. Murao,et al.  Precision-guaranteed quantum tomography. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[38]  I. Walmsley,et al.  Optimal experiment design for quantum state tomography: Fair, precise, and minimal tomography , 2009, 0911.4310.

[39]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  How to best sample a periodic probability distribution, or on the accuracy of Hamiltonian finding strategies , 2013, Quantum Inf. Process..

[40]  H M Wiseman,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown phase , 2010, CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[41]  W. Vogel,et al.  Least-squares inversion for density-matrix reconstruction , 1997 .

[42]  Shuntaro Takeda,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Optical-Phase Tracking , 2012, Science.

[43]  André Stefanov,et al.  Adaptive quantum state estimation of an entangled qubit state. , 2014, Optics letters.