Sensitivity evaluation and selective plane imaging geometry for x‐ray‐induced luminescence imaging

Purpose: X‐ray‐induced luminescence (XIL) is a hybrid x‐ray/optical imaging modality that employs nanophosphors that luminescence in response to x‐ray irradiation. X‐ray‐activated phosphorescent nanoparticles have potential applications in radiation therapy as theranostics, nanodosimeters, or radiosensitizers. Extracting clinically relevant information from the luminescent signal requires the development of a robust imaging model that can determine nanophosphor distributions at depth in an optically scattering environment from surface radiance measurements. The applications of XIL in radiotherapy will be limited by the dose‐dependent sensitivity at depth in tissue. We propose a novel geometry called selective plane XIL (SPXIL), and apply it to experimental measurements in optical gel phantoms and sensitivity simulations. Methods: An imaging model is presented based on the selective plane geometry which can determine the detected diffuse optical signal for a given x‐ray dose and nanophosphor distribution at depth in a semi‐infinite, optically homogenous material. The surface radiance in the model is calculated using an analytical solution to the extrapolated boundary condition. Y2O3:Eu3+ nanoparticles are synthesized and inserted into various optical phantom in order to measure the luminescent output per unit dose for a given concentration of nanophosphors and calibrate an imaging model for XIL sensitivity simulations. SPXIL imaging with a dual‐source optical gel phantom is performed, and an iterative Richardson–Lucy deconvolution using a shifted Poisson noise model is applied to the measurements in order to reconstruct the nanophosphor distribution. Results: Nanophosphor characterizations showed a peak emission at 611 nm, a linear luminescent response to tube current and nanoparticle concentration, and a quadratic luminescent response to tube voltage. The luminescent efficiency calculation accomplished with calibrated bioluminescence mouse phantoms determines 1.06 photons were emitted per keV of x‐ray radiation absorbed per g/mL of nanophosphor concentration. Sensitivity simulations determined that XIL could detect a concentration of 1 mg/mL of nanophosphors with a dose of 1 cGy at a depth ranging from 2 to 4 cm, depending on the optical parameters of the homogeneous diffuse optical environment. The deconvolution applied to the SPXIL measurements could resolve two sources 1 cm apart up to a depth of 1.75 cm in the diffuse phantom. Conclusions: We present a novel imaging geometry for XIL in a homogenous, diffuse optical environment. Basic characterization of Y2O3:Eu3+ nanophosphors are presented along with XIL/SPXIL measurements in optical gel phantoms. The diffuse optical imaging model is validated using these measurements and then calibrated in order to execute initial sensitivity simulations for the dose‐depth limitations of XIL imaging. The SPXIL imaging model is used to perform a deconvolution on a dual‐source phantom, which successfully reconstructs the nanophosphor distributions.

[1]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Beam and tissue factors affecting Cherenkov image intensity for quantitative entrance and exit dosimetry on human tissue , 2017, Journal of biophotonics.

[2]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Multiple pinhole collimator based X-ray luminescence computed tomography. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[3]  B. Pogue,et al.  Light sheet luminescence imaging with Cherenkov excitation in thick scattering media. , 2016, Optics letters.

[4]  Thierry Bastogne,et al.  Nanoparticles for Radiation Therapy Enhancement: the Key Parameters , 2015, Theranostics.

[5]  Matthieu Réfrégiers,et al.  X-ray-induced radiophotodynamic therapy (RPDT) using lanthanide micelles: Beyond depth limitations , 2015, Nano Research.

[6]  B. Pogue High Resolution Molecular Imaging with Čerenkov-Excited Luminscence Scanned Imaging (ČELSI) , 2015 .

[7]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  Radioluminescence characterization of in situ x-ray nanodosimeters: Potential real-time monitors and modulators of external beam radiation therapy. , 2014, Applied physics letters.

[8]  Wenbin Lin,et al.  Nanoscale Metal–Organic Framework for Highly Effective Photodynamic Therapy of Resistant Head and Neck Cancer , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Shouping Zhu,et al.  Quantitative cone beam X-ray luminescence tomography/X-ray computed tomography imaging , 2014 .

[10]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  X-Ray Luminescence and X-Ray Fluorescence Computed Tomography: New Molecular Imaging Modalities , 2014, IEEE Access.

[11]  Lun Ma,et al.  A new X-ray activated nanoparticle photosensitizer for cancer treatment. , 2014, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[12]  Ge Wang,et al.  X-ray fan-beam luminescence tomography , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[13]  Lei Xing,et al.  Synergistic Assembly of Heavy Metal Clusters and Luminescent Organic Bridging Ligands in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient X-ray Scintillation , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Simon R Cherry,et al.  Numerical simulation of x-ray luminescence optical tomography for small-animal imaging , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Julien Bec,et al.  X-ray luminescence optical tomography imaging: experimental studies. , 2013, Optics letters.

[16]  S. Jacques Optical properties of biological tissues: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Jie Tian,et al.  Cone beam x-ray luminescence computed tomography: a feasibility study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[18]  John C. Gore,et al.  Monitoring pH-triggered drug release from radioluminescent nanocapsules with X-ray excited optical luminescence. , 2013, ACS nano.

[19]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Time-gated Cherenkov emission spectroscopy from linear accelerator irradiation of tissue phantoms. , 2012, Optics letters.

[20]  Lei Xing,et al.  Tomographic molecular imaging of x-ray-excitable nanoparticles. , 2010, Optics letters.

[21]  L Xing,et al.  Hybrid x-ray/optical luminescence imaging: characterization of experimental conditions. , 2010, Medical physics.

[22]  Lei Xing,et al.  X-Ray Luminescence Computed Tomography via Selective Excitation: A Feasibility Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Performance dependence of hybrid x-ray computed tomography/fluorescence molecular tomography on the optical forward problem. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  B. Pogue,et al.  Tutorial on diffuse light transport. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  Liang Sun,et al.  The two-photon excitation of SiO2-coated Y2O3:Eu3+ nanoparticles by a near-infrared femtosecond laser , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[26]  A. Joly,et al.  Investigation of water-soluble x-ray luminescence nanoparticles for photodynamic activation , 2008 .

[27]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[28]  C. Eijk,et al.  Inorganic scintillators in medical imaging detectors , 2003 .

[29]  B. Rice,et al.  In vivo imaging of light-emitting probes. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  R Cubeddu,et al.  A solid tissue phantom for photon migration studies. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  C. Helstrom,et al.  Compensation for readout noise in CCD images , 1995 .

[32]  L. O. Svaasand,et al.  Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  R. White,et al.  Image recovery from data acquired with a charge-coupled-device camera. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  L. Lucy An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .

[35]  L. Xing,et al.  Cone Beam X-ray Luminescence Computed Tomography Based on Bayesian Method. , 2017, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[36]  William H. Richardson,et al.  Bayesian-Based Iterative Method of Image Restoration , 1972 .