Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance.

In this experiment we studied how thresholding by the gray-scale display transformation altered the observer's ability to detect small, high-contrast lesions in both smooth (lower-noise) and sharp (higher-noise) reconstructions of computed tomographic (CT) images. Different display conditions manipulated the level setting of a narrow CT display window. This varied the fraction of thresholded pixels, set to the maximum or minimum values of brightness in relevant locations of the displayed images. Observers' ability to detect lesions in the smooth CT images was unaffected by moderate asymmetries in the display level but then abruptly declined at both the extremely high- and low-level settings. In sharp CT images, the lesion gradually decreased in detectability as the level setting became more asymmetric. These effects of the display manipulations were modeled by a realizable physical detector, whose decision variable was the cross correlation of the pixel display values with the lesion's expected profile at the specified (lesion and nonlesion) locations in the CT images. This cross-correlator model closely predicted the patterns of changes in lesion detectability that were measured for the human observers. It also predicted how thresholding of the higher or the lower CT numbers differentially altered the shapes of the observers' measured receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the smooth CT images.

[1]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Some aspects of ROC curve-fitting: Normal and logistic models , 1972 .

[2]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Effects Of The CT Display Window On Detectability Of Large And Small Lesions , 1984, Medical Imaging.

[3]  R C Warren,et al.  Effect of window width and viewing distance in CT display. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[5]  P F Judy,et al.  Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  W Grossman,et al.  Evaluating the radiographic assessment of pulmonary venous hypertension in chronic heart disease. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  C. Ytterbergh,et al.  Perceptibility of Experimental and Clinical Lesions in the CT Image with and without Image Processing , 1981, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[8]  R. C. Warren Detectability of low-contrast features in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Detectability Of Lesions Of Various Sizes On CT Images , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[13]  D. Bamber The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph , 1975 .

[14]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection and signal–to–noise ratio in CT images , 1981 .

[15]  R. Jones,et al.  Quantum efficiency of human vision. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[17]  H. Barlow The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[18]  R G Swensson,et al.  Evaluation of observer performance in detecting blood vessels on simulated angiographic images. , 1978, Medical physics.

[19]  A. Simpson,et al.  What is the best index of detectability? , 1973, Psychological Bulletin.

[20]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Size Discrimination Of Features On CT Images , 1986, Other Conferences.

[21]  R G Swensson,et al.  Detection of small focal lesions in CT images: effects of reconstruction filters and visual display windows. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .