Do weekend oocyte retrievals have an impact on the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles outcome?

Introduction Despite the fact that ovarian stimulation is controlled, it is not always predictable. Because the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) injection depends mainly on the patient's ovarian response to gonadotrophins, the day of oocyte retrieval cannot be determined in advance. As a result, oocyte retrievals are often scheduled to occur on weekends, a fact that entails at least one extra working day for the staff, and could lead to physical and psychological stress, especially in embryologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes are influenced by the day of oocyte retrieval. Material and methods A total of 327 ICSI cycles, whose retrievals were performed on Wednesdays and Sundays, were analysed in this retrospective study. Cycles were subdivided into two groups according to the day of oocyte retrieval: group W (n = 196), cycles in which oocyte retrieval was performed on Wednesday; and group S (n = 131), cycles in which oocyte retrieval was performed on Sunday. Groups were compared regarding fertilization, implantation, pregnancy and take-home baby rates. Results No significant differences were observed between groups A and B regarding fertilization rate (68.9% and 72.5%; p = 0.1589), implantation rate (21.8% and 24.3%; p = 0.5714), pregnancy rate (29.9% and 31.6%; p = 0.7129) and take-home baby rate (23.6% and 28.1%; p = 0.4351). Conclusions A well-trained embryologist's group adhering to staff scheduling allows large programmes to ensure a similar outcome independent of the workload or workday on which embryologists perform the manipulation of gametes.

[1]  M. Lane,et al.  Avoidance of weekend oocyte retrievals during GnRH antagonist treatment by simple advancement or delay of hCG administration does not adversely affect IVF live birth outcomes. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[2]  T. Bonetti,et al.  Use of pig oocytes for training new professionals in human assisted reproduction laboratories. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  C. Keck,et al.  Staff management in the in vitro fertilization laboratory. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  M. Wikland,et al.  The application of quality systems in ART programs , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[5]  P. Matson Internal quality control and external quality assurance in the IVF laboratory. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[6]  K. Nakagawa,et al.  Avoidance of oocyte retrieval on the weekend through the use of scheduled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  P. Devroey,et al.  Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte , 1992, The Lancet.

[8]  S. Hillier,et al.  Superovulation strategy before in vitro fertilization. , 1985, Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  H. Jacobs,et al.  INDUCTION OF OVULATION FOR IN-VITRO FERTILISATION USING BUSERELIN AND GONADOTROPINS , 1984, The Lancet.

[10]  P V Dandekar,et al.  Laboratory setup for human in vitro fertilization. , 1984, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  B. Prieto,et al.  Daily workload in the embryology laboratory and in vitro fertilization results. , 2010, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[12]  P. Kastrop Quality management in the ART laboratory. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[13]  C. Peterson,et al.  In vitro fertilisation. A review of drug therapy and clinical management. , 1996, Drugs.