The American brachytherapy society survey of brachytherapy practice for carcinoma of the cervix in the United States.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to survey the brachytherapy practice for cervical cancer in the United States. METHODS The Clinical Research Committee of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) performed a retrospective survey of individual physicians of the ABS and American Society of Therapeutic Radiologists and Oncologists regarding the details of the brachytherapy techniques they personally used in the treatment of cervical cancer patients for the year 1995. The replies (some of which may have been an estimate only) were tabulated. The scope of this survey did not allow us to verify the data by chart audits. RESULTS A total of about 3500 questionnaires were mailed out; 521 responses were received. Of these responders, 206 (40%) did not perform any brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix in 1995. Of the other 315 responders reporting a total of 4892 patients treated in 1995, 88% used low dose rate (LDR) while 24% used high dose rate (HDR). There was a wide variation in the doses used. For LDR treatments, the median total external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) dose was 45 and 50 Gy and the LDR dose was 42 and 45 Gy for early and advanced cancers, respectively. For HDR treatments, the median EBRT dose was 48 and 50 Gy and the median HDR dose was 29 and 30 Gy for early and advanced cancers, respectively. The median dose per fraction was 6 Gy for a median of five fractions. Interstitial brachytherapy was used as a component of the treatment in 6% of the patients by 21% of responders. Very few responders treated with pulsed or medium dose rates. CONCLUSION This retrospective survey showed the current brachytherapy practice pattern in the treatment of cervical cancer in the United States and can serve as a basis for future prospective national brachytherapy data registry. There was wide variation in the practice pattern, emphasizing the urgent need for consensus on these issues.

[1]  J. Fowler,et al.  High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: the Madison system: II. Procedural and physical considerations. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  G E Hanks,et al.  Long-term results of treatment of cervical carcinoma in the United States in 1973, 1978, and 1983: Patterns of Care Study (PCS). , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  G. Montana,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix, stage III. Results of radiation therapy , 1986, Cancer.

[4]  C. Orton,et al.  Multifractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy with concomitant daily teletherapy for cervical cancer. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  L. Coia,et al.  Pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a final report of the 1973 and 1978 patterns of care studies. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  T. Inoue,et al.  Treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by remotely controlled afterloading intracavitary radiotherapy with high-dose rate: a comparative study with a low-dose rate system. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J. Purdy,et al.  Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of uterine cervix I. Analysis of tumor recurrence , 1983, Cancer.

[8]  C. Perez,et al.  Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a 20-year experience. , 1986, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  P. Eifel High-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: high tech or high risk? , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  C. Orton,et al.  Comparison of high and low dose rate remote afterloading for cervix cancer and the importance of fractionation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  K. Dusenbery,et al.  Perioperative morbidity and mortality of gynecologic brachytherapy , 1991, Cancer.

[13]  J. Blasko,et al.  Survey of brachytherapy practice in the United States: a report of the Clinical Research Committee of the American Endocurietherapy Society. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  C. Ling,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies: review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  J. Fowler,et al.  High dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: the Madison system: I. Clinical and radiobiological considerations. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Takashi Nakano,et al.  High‐dose‐rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20‐year experience , 1992, Cancer.

[17]  P. Eifel,et al.  The influence of tumor size and growth habit on outcome of patients with figo stage ib squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix , 1993 .

[18]  S Nag,et al.  The use of fluoroscopy to guide needle placement in interstitial gynecological brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  F. Patel,et al.  Low dose rate vs. high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical trial. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J. Blasko,et al.  Consensus guidelines for high dose rate remote brachytherapy in cervical, endometrial, and endobronchial tumors. Clinical Research Committee, American Endocurietherapy Society. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.