DFID Working Paper 38. Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations.

Diese Studie behandelt schwierige methodologische und theoretische Herausforderungen, mit denen jene konfrontiert sind, welche die Auswirkungen internationaler Entwicklungspolitik bewerten wollen. Die meisten Investitionen in die Wirkungsevaluierung (WE) sind bisher in einen engen Teilbereich von vorwiegend experimentellen und statistischen Methoden und Entwurfen gegangen, die nach DFID nur auf einen kleinen Teil ihres derzeitigen Programmportfolios anwendbar sind. Diese Studie soll das Spektrum erweitern und komplexe und schwer zu evaluierende Programme mit den Moglichkeiten der WE erschliesen. Die Studie betrachtet die bestehende WE-Praxis, uberpruft die Literatur zu den Methoden und beurteilt, wie hochmoderne Evaluierungsentwurfe und -methoden bei aktuellen Entwicklungsprogrammen angewendet werden konnten.

[1]  David C Aron,et al.  Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: A case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[2]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[3]  Patricia J. Rogers,et al.  Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models , 2011 .

[4]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Configurational Comparative Methods , 2011 .

[5]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[6]  Angus Deaton.  Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development , 2010 .

[7]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[8]  Jessica Dart,et al.  A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique , 2003 .

[9]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[10]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[11]  Michael Woolcock,et al.  Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development , 2010 .

[12]  David Byrne,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods , 2009 .

[13]  David Ellerman,et al.  Helping People Help Themselves: From the World Bank to an Alternative Philosophy of Development Assistance , 2005 .

[14]  C. Seale,et al.  Quality in Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[15]  Roger B. Straw,et al.  Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings , 2002 .

[16]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[17]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[18]  Ali Al Mamari,et al.  Riding the Diabetes Rollercoaster: A new approach for health professionals, patients and carers , 2008 .

[19]  Howard White,et al.  Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice , 2009 .

[20]  J. Mackie,et al.  I . CAUSES AND CONDITIONS , 2008 .

[21]  Frans L. Leeuw,et al.  Impact evaluations and development : NONIE guidance on impact evaluation , 2009 .

[22]  A. Langley,et al.  Explaining Diffusion Patterns for Complex Health Care Innovations , 2002, Health care management review.

[23]  K. Howe.  A Critique of Experimentalism , 2004 .

[24]  Michael Woolcock,et al.  Toward a plurality of methods in project evaluation: a contextualised approach to understanding impact trajectories and efficacy , 2009 .

[25]  S. Glouberman.  Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like? , 2002 .

[26]  David L. Dollar,et al.  Assessing aid - what works, what doesn't, and why , 1998 .

[27]  Paul Mosley,et al.  Foreign aid, its defense and reform , 1987 .

[28]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[29]  Aaditya Mattoo,et al.  Impact Evaluation of Trade Interventions: Paving the Way , 2011 .

[30]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition , 2002 .

[31]  Paul Noordhof,et al.  Cause and Chance: Causation in an Indeterministic World , 2003 .

[32]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[33]  Jon Elster,et al.  Social Mechanisms: A plea for mechanisms , 1998 .

[34]  Leonard A. Steverson.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .

[35]  Paul Cilliers,et al.  Boundaries , Hierarchies and Networks in Complex Systems , 2005 .

[36]  P. Suppes.  A Probabilistic Theory Of Causality , 1970 .

[37]  Inge Bleijenbergh.  Method of Agreement , 2010 .

[38]  P. Machamer,et al.  Thinking about Mechanisms , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[39]  David Collier,et al.  Understanding Process Tracing , 2011, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[40]  George C. Abbott.  Foreign aid: its defense and reform , 1988 .

[41]  Lucy Dillon,et al.  Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. , 2003 .

[42]  H. White,et al.  A Contribution to Current Debates in Impact Evaluation , 2010 .

[43]  David Collier,et al.  Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology , 2004 .

[44]  N. Denzin.  Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs , 2010 .

[45]  Donald Nute,et al.  Counterfactuals , 1975, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[46]  H. Davies,et al.  Using Evidence: How research can inform public services , 2007 .

[47]  Stephen Platt,et al.  Evaluation in the face of uncertainty , 2010 .

[48]  A BrownSusan,et al.  Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide , 2013 .

[49]  B. Singer,et al.  Causality in the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[50]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[51]  Değerlendirme ve Sonuç,et al.  Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results-based Management in Sustainable Development (Second Edition) , 2023 .

[52]  S. Greenland,et al.  Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[53]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[54]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry , 1992 .

[55]  David Byrne.  Introduction: Case-Based Methods: Why We Need Them; What They Are; How to Do Them , 2009 .

[56]  David McDonald,et al.  Realworld Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints , 2007 .

[57]  D. Anthony.  Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective , 2007 .

[58]  R. Quentin Grafton,et al.  crowding-out effect , 2012 .

[59]  Eileen Munro,et al.  The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[60]  Peter Menzies,et al.  Probabilistic Causation and Causal Processes: A Critique of Lewis , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[61]  Pat R I C I,et al.  Rogers : Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated 29 Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions , 2007 .

[62]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Evaluation studies : review annual , 1976 .

[63]  P. Kivisto.  Chaos of disciplines , 2002 .

[64]  S. Glennan.  Mechanisms and the nature of causation , 1996 .

[65]  J. Mahoney.  Toward a Unified Theory of Causality , 2008 .

[66]  Edward Mackinnon.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation: and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science , 1967 .

[67]  Dorothy Edgington,et al.  Counterfactuals and the benefit of hindsight , 2006 .

[68]  Devra C. Moehler,et al.  Democracy, Governance, and Randomized Development Assistance , 2010 .

[69]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[70]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[71]  J. Mackie,et al.  The cement of the universe : a study of causation , 1977 .

[72]  Evan S. Lieberman,et al.  Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[73]  J. Reveley.  Path Dependence , 2008, Prisoners of the Past.

[74]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Causality for beginners , 2008 .

[75]  T. Troward.  Causes and conditions. , 1919 .

[76]  Giel Ton,et al.  The mixing of methods: A three-step process for improving rigour in impact evaluations , 2012 .

[77]  Andrew Bennett,et al.  Process Tracing and Causal Inference , 2010 .