Evaluation of grazing beef cows receiving supplements with different protein contents

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation with different crude protein contents on the productive performance of grazing beef cows during post-calving. Thirty-six beef cows, with age and average body weight of 5 years and 490±17.9 kg, respectively, were used. The experimental design was completely randomized. The treatments were: control = cows received only mineral mixture ad libitum; supplemented = cows received 1 kg d-1 of supplement containing 80, 200, or 320 g crude protein (CP) kg-1. There was no effect (P ? 0.16) of supplementation on voluntary intake. A linear effect (P < 0.02) of the CP content in the supplements was observed among supplemented cows, only for the CP intake. Supplementation did not affect (P ? 0.20) the total digestibility of organic matter, neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein, and CP. Among supplemented cows, a positive linear effect (P < 0.01) of the CP content in the supplement was observed for the CP digestibility. Intestinal flow of microbial nitrogen compounds and efficiency of synthesis microbial were not affected (P ? 0.18) by treatments. Performance, milk yield and composition were not also affected (P ? 0.11) by treatments. Supplementation did not affect (P ? 0.52) non-esterified fatty acids, urea nitrogen and progesterone serum concentrations. It is concluded that supplementation of grazing beef cows during post-calving does not affect nutritional and productive performance.

[1]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  Nutritional aspects applied to grazing cattle in the tropics: a review based on Brazilian results , 2014 .

[2]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation , 2014 .

[3]  E. Scholljegerdes,et al.  Does β-hydroxybutyrate concentration influence conception date in young postpartum range beef cows? , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[4]  E. Detmann,et al.  Performance of young bulls supplemented with different relation of protein and carbohydrate from suckling phase until slaughter in tropical pasture , 2013 .

[5]  M. Paulino,et al.  Levels of supplementation for grazing pregnant beef cows during the dry season , 2012 .

[6]  M. Chizzotti,et al.  Creatinine excretion and relationship with body weight of Nellore cattle , 2012 .

[7]  E. Detmann,et al.  Replacement of soybean meal by cottonseed meal 38% in multiple supplements for grazing beef heifers , 2011 .

[8]  E. Detmann,et al.  Endogenous fraction and urinary recovery of purine derivatives obtained by different methods in Nellore cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[9]  H. C. Mantovani,et al.  Parameterization of ruminal fibre degradation in low-quality tropical forage using Michaelis–Menten kinetics , 2009 .

[10]  John J. Robinson,et al.  Nutrition and fertility in ruminant livestock , 2006 .

[11]  G. Oetzel Monitoring and testing dairy herds for metabolic disease. , 2004, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[12]  Ana Lorena Amador-R,et al.  Productive and nutritional phenology of corn for the yield of fodder. , 2000 .

[13]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of replacing alfalfa silage with high moisture corn on ruminal protein synthesis estimated from excretion of total purine derivatives. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  X. B. Chen,et al.  ESTIMATION OF MICROBIAL PROTEIN SUPPLY TO SHEEP AND CATTLE BASED ON URINARY EXCRETION OF PURINE DERIVATIVES - AN OVERVIEW OF THE TECHNICAL DETAILS , 1995 .