Framing scenarios of binational water policy with a tool to visualize, quantify and valuate changes in ecosystem services

In the Santa Cruz Watershed, located on the Arizona-Sonora portion of the U.S.-Mexico border, an international wastewater treatment plant treats wastewater from cities on both sides of the border, before discharging it into the river in Arizona. These artificial flows often subsidize important perennial surface water ecosystems in the region. An explicit understanding of the benefits of maintaining instream flow for present and future generations requires the ability to assess and understand the important trade-offs implicit in water-resource management decisions. In this paper, we outline an approach for modeling and visualizing impacts of management decisions in terms of rare terrestrial and aquatic wildlife, vegetation, surface water, groundwater recharge, real-estate values and socio-environmental vulnerable communities. We identify and quantify ecosystem services and model the potential reduction in effluent discharge to the U.S. that is under scrutiny by binational water policy makers and of concern to stakeholders. Results of service provisioning are presented, and implications for policy makers and resource managers are discussed. This paper presents a robust ecosystem services assessment of multiple

[1]  S. Skagen,et al.  Comparative Use of Riparian Corridors and Oases by Migrating Birds in Southeast Arizona , 1998 .

[2]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing , 1999 .

[3]  F. Lara-Valencia,et al.  Flood hazard awareness and hydrologic modelling at Ambos Nogales, United States–Mexico border , 2010 .

[4]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .

[5]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Ecosystem services across borders: a framework for transboundary conservation policy , 2010 .

[6]  S. Carpenter,et al.  ECONOMIC VALUATION OF FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE UNITED STATES: 1971-1997 , 1999 .

[7]  P. G. Tizien,et al.  Santa Cruz , 2006 .

[8]  Chris HILLMANContents,et al.  WHAT IS A CONCEPT ? , 1998 .

[9]  G. Frisvold,et al.  Financing Wastewater Collection and Treatment on the U.S. – Mexico Border , 2002 .

[10]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[11]  M. T. Ahmed Millennium ecosystem assessment , 2002, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[12]  Juan Manuel Torres,et al.  Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results , 2008 .

[13]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  The South Florida Ecosystem Portfolio Model - A Map-Based Multicriteria Ecological, Economic, and Community Land-Use Planning Tool , 2009 .

[14]  S. Marsh,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF WASTEWATER SUBSIDY, FLOOD DISTURBANCE AND NEIGHBOURING LAND USE ON CURRENT AND HISTORICAL PATTERNS OF RIPARIAN VEGETATION IN A SEMI‐ARID WATERSHED , 2012 .

[15]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Multi-gauge Calibration for Modeling the Semi-Arid Santa Cruz Watershed in Arizona-Mexico Border Area Using SWAT , 2012 .

[16]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Mapping socio-environmentally vulnerable populations access and exposure to ecosystem services at the U.S.–Mexico borderlands , 2012 .

[17]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Developing an ecosystem services online decision support tool to assess the impacts of climate change and urban growth in the santa cruz watershed; where we live, work, and play , 2010 .

[18]  P. Kareiva,et al.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Farhana Azim Design in Nature , 2014 .

[20]  Francina Dominguez,et al.  IPCC-AR4 climate simulations for the Southwestern US: the importance of future ENSO projections , 2010 .

[21]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[22]  Sean T. O'Brien Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems , 1998 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[24]  B. Colby,et al.  An Economic Assessment of the Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan , 2006 .

[25]  Cynthia K. Dohner U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , 1998 .

[26]  Beatrice Gralton,et al.  Washington DC - USA , 2008 .

[27]  R. Varady,et al.  Transboundary Water Resources and Public Health in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region , 1995 .

[28]  Rosalind H. Bark,et al.  Levelling the playing field—A case study of how non-market values can compete in policy debates over wastewater allocation in a semi-arid region , 2011 .

[29]  Laura M. Norman,et al.  Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor , 2013 .

[30]  R. Bark,et al.  How Do Homebuyers Value Different Types of Green Space , 2011 .

[31]  R. Bark,et al.  Habitat Preservation and Restoration: Do Homebuyers have Preferences for Quality Habitat? , 2009 .

[32]  PLANTA DE TRATAMIENTO DE AGUAS RESIDUALES , 2012 .

[33]  Robert Costanza,et al.  49 Chapter 4 VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES WITH EFFICIENCY , FAIRNESS , AND SUSTAINABILITY AS GOALS , 1999 .