A p-y Curve-Based Approach to Analyze Pile Behavior in Liquefied Sand under Different Stress States

In general, p-y curves that represent the soil resisting force per unit length of pile as a function of soil displacement are used to model the interaction behavior of soil and pile. However, there are significant uncertainties about how to model soil-pile behavior in liquefied sand, especially for the different softening effect of liquefied soil under different states of soil-pile interaction. A new p-y model, which is capable of reflecting the dilative behavior of soil and the gap effect under different soil stress states, is presented in an attempt to develop a practical approach for soil-pile interaction behavior. This p-y model incorporates an upperbound p-y curve calculated from the improved p-multiplier and y-multiplier and a lower-bound p-y curve regarding the residual state of the soil-pile reaction in liquefied sand. Also, for the stress state between the two boundaries, the p-y curve can be approximately obtained from linear interpolation. The comparison between calculated results and the results of pile lateral-load test, which was taken in medium dense sand liquefied by blast load, indicate that the proposed p-y model provides reasonable estimates of response for piles in liquefied medium dense sand while pile-head displacements were less than 150mm.

[1]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Post-Triggering Response of Liquefied Sand in the Free Field and Near Foundations , 1998 .

[2]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation , 2005 .

[3]  Kyle M. Rollins,et al.  RESPONSE OF 0.6 M CAST-IN-STEEL-SHELL PILE IN LIQUEFIED SOIL UNDER LATERAL LOADING , 2005 .

[4]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Observed Seismic Lateral Resistance of Liquefying Sand , 2000 .

[5]  San-Shyan Lin,et al.  Damage of Piles Caused by Lateral Spreading- Back Study of Three Cases , 2005 .

[6]  Jean-Pierre Bardet,et al.  Proceedings of the Seventh U.S.-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures against Soil Liquefaction : held at the Sheraton Hotel and Towers, Seattle, Washington, August 15-17, 1999 , 1999 .

[7]  K. M. Rollins,et al.  TILT : the Treasure Island Liquefaction Test : final report , 2002 .

[8]  S. H. Cheng,et al.  FD Solutions for Static and Dynamic Winkler Models with Lateral Spread Induced Earth Pressures on Piles , 2008 .

[9]  H. Matlock Correlation for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay , 1970 .

[10]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  P-Y CURVE TO MODEL LATERAL RESPONSE OF PILE FOUNDATIONS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS , 2008 .

[11]  AshourMohamed,et al.  p–y curve and lateral response of piles in fully liquefied sands , 2012 .

[12]  Kyle M. Rollins,et al.  Lateral Resistance of a Full-Scale Pile Group in Liquefied Sand , 2005 .

[13]  K M Rollins,et al.  TILT: THE TREASURE ISLAND LIQUEFACTION TEST , 2002 .

[14]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  Case Studies of Pile Foundations Undergoing Lateral Spreading in Liquefied Deposits , 2004 .

[15]  R. Dobry,et al.  EFFECT OF LIQUEFACTION ON LATERAL RESPONSE OF PILES BY CENTRIFUGE MODEL TESTS , 1999 .

[16]  D. J. Wilson,et al.  SOIL-PILE-SUPERSTRUCTURE INTERACTION IN LIQUEFYING SAND AND SOFT CLAY , 1998 .

[17]  Lymon C. Reese,et al.  Design of Pile Foundations in Liquefied Soils , 1998 .

[18]  Fred H. Kulhawy,et al.  Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design , 1990 .

[19]  D. Gillette On the Use of Empirical Correlations for Estimating the Residual Undrained Shear Strength of Liquefied Soils in Dam Foundations , 2010 .

[20]  L. Reese,et al.  Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand , 1974 .