Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children’s Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board

[1]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  H. Saal,et al.  Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children , 2013, Pediatrics.

[3]  Susan M. Wolf,et al.  The past, present, and future of the debate over return of research results and incidental findings , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  Patrick L. Taylor,et al.  The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[5]  Robert C. Green,et al.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  Patrick L. Taylor,et al.  The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture. , 2012, Minnesota journal of law, science & technology.

[7]  George Church,et al.  Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[8]  Patrick L. Taylor,et al.  Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It Right , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  M. Khoury,et al.  Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[10]  Richard R Sharp,et al.  Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[11]  M. Khoury,et al.  Personal utility and genomic information: Look before you leap , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[12]  J. Witte,et al.  The Scientific Foundation for Personal Genomics: Recommendations from a National Institutes of Health–Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multidisciplinary Workshop , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[13]  Gail Geller,et al.  Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[14]  Kathy Hudson,et al.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[15]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Reestablishing the Researcher-Patient Compact , 2007, Science.

[16]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Medicine. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact. , 2007, Science.

[17]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[18]  M. Rothstein.  Tiered Disclosure Options Promote the Autonomy and Well-Being of Research Subjects , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[19]  H. Richardson,et al.  The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. , 2004, The Hastings Center report.

[20]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. , 2013, Pediatrics.

[21]  P. Reilly.  When should an investigator share raw data with the subjects? , 1980, IRB.