Impact of cloud horizontal inhomogeneity and directional sampling on the retrieval of cloud droplet size by the POLDER instrument

Abstract. The principles of cloud droplet size retrieval via Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectance (POLDER) requires that clouds be horizontally homogeneous. The retrieval is performed by combining all measurements from an area of 150 km × 150 km to compensate for POLDER's insufficient directional sampling. Using POLDER-like data simulated with the RT3 model, we investigate the impact of cloud horizontal inhomogeneity and directional sampling on the retrieval and analyze which spatial resolution is potentially accessible from the measurements. Case studies show that the sub-grid-scale variability in droplet effective radius (CDR) can significantly reduce valid retrievals and introduce small biases to the CDR (~ 1.5 μm) and effective variance (EV) estimates. Nevertheless, the sub-grid-scale variations in EV and cloud optical thickness (COT) only influence the EV retrievals and not the CDR estimate. In the directional sampling cases studied, the retrieval using limited observations is accurate and is largely free of random noise. Several improvements have been made to the original POLDER droplet size retrieval. For example, measurements in the primary rainbow region (137–145°) are used to ensure retrievals of large droplet (> 15 μm) and to reduce the uncertainties caused by cloud heterogeneity. We apply the improved method using the POLDER global L1B data from June 2008, and the new CDR results are compared with the operational CDRs. The comparison shows that the operational CDRs tend to be underestimated for large droplets because the cloudbow oscillations in the scattering angle region of 145–165° are weak for cloud fields with CDR > 15 μm. Finally, a sub-grid-scale retrieval case demonstrates that a higher resolution, e.g., 42 km × 42 km, can be used when inverting cloud droplet size distribution parameters from POLDER measurements.

[1]  Eric F. Vermote,et al.  A Vector Version of the 6S Radiative Transfer Code for Atmospheric Correction of Satellite Data , 2006 .

[2]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 1. Data and models , 2000 .

[3]  Jim Haywood,et al.  The effect of overlying absorbing aerosol layers on remote sensing retrievals of cloud effective radius and cloud optical depth , 2004 .

[4]  J. Slusser,et al.  On Rayleigh Optical Depth Calculations , 1999 .

[5]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Impact of three‐dimensional radiative effects on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet sizes , 2006 .

[6]  Roger Davies,et al.  Anisotropy of water cloud reflectance: A comparison of measurements and 1D theory , 2004 .

[7]  P. Stier,et al.  Satellite observations of cloud regime development: the role of aerosol processes , 2013 .

[8]  Mikhail Alexandrov,et al.  A new three-parameter cloud/aerosol particle size distribution based on the generalized inverse Gaussian density function , 2000, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Effects of Cloud Horizontal Inhomogeneity and Drizzle on Remote Sensing of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius: Case Studies Based on Large-eddy Simulations , 2012 .

[10]  M. Mishchenko,et al.  Rainbow Fourier transform , 2012 .

[11]  Olivier Hagolle,et al.  Interband calibration over clouds for POLDER space sensor , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Zhibo Zhang.  On the sensitivity of cloud effective radius retrieval based on spectral method to bi-modal droplet size distribution: A semi-analytical model , 2013 .

[13]  Philip Watts,et al.  Global retrieval of ATSR cloud parameters and evaluation (GRAPE): dataset assessment , 2010 .

[14]  M. Jensen,et al.  Relationship between cloud radiative forcing, cloud fraction and cloud albedo, and new surface-based approach for determining cloud albedo , 2011 .

[15]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel , 2013 .

[16]  P. Minnis,et al.  The impact of horizontal heterogeneities, cloud fraction, and liquid water path on warm cloud effective radii from CERES-like Aqua MODIS retrievals , 2013 .

[17]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Cloud droplet effective radius from spaceborne polarization measurements , 1998 .

[18]  A. Ishimaru,et al.  Multiple scattering calculations for nonspherical particles based on the vector radiative transfer theory , 1984 .

[19]  Sonoyo Mukai,et al.  A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters , 2003 .

[20]  Paquita Zuidema,et al.  Assessment of MODIS cloud effective radius and optical thickness retrievals over the Southeast Pacific with VOCALS‐REx in situ measurements , 2011 .

[21]  Lin Su,et al.  Synergetic Use of MODIS Cloud Parameters for Distinguishing High Aerosol Loadings From Clouds Over the North China Plain , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Graeme L. Stephens,et al.  A new polarized atmospheric radiative transfer model , 1991 .

[23]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[24]  E. Hicks,et al.  Sensitivity of a GCM to changes in the droplet effective radius parameterization , 1997 .

[25]  S. Zeng,et al.  Examination of POLDER/PARASOL and MODIS/Aqua Cloud Fractions and Properties Representativeness , 2011 .

[26]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Joseph D. LaVeigne,et al.  Research scanning polarimeter and airborne usage for remote sensing of aerosols , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[28]  B. Cairns,et al.  Interactive comment on “Remote sensing of ice crystal asymmetry parameter using multi-directional polarization measurements – Part 1: Methodology and evaluation with simulated measurements” by B. van Diedenhoven et al , 2012 .

[29]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Climate. How do aerosols affect cloudiness and climate? , 2006, Science.

[30]  E. Vermote,et al.  Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part I: path radiance. , 2006, Applied optics.

[31]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  A Global Determination of Cloud Microphysics with AVHRR Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[32]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[33]  Steven Platnick,et al.  A global view of one‐dimensional solar radiative transfer through oceanic water clouds , 2010 .

[34]  J. Roujean,et al.  Retrieval of atmospheric properties and surface bidirectional reflectances over land from POLDER/ADEOS , 1997 .

[35]  Andi Walther,et al.  Implementation of the Daytime Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties Algorithm (DCOMP) in PATMOS-x , 2012 .

[36]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Global distribution of cloud droplet effective radius from POLDER polarization measurements , 2000 .

[37]  T. Zinner,et al.  Testing remote sensing on artificial observations: impact of drizzle and 3-D cloud structure on effective radius retrievals , 2010 .

[38]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part II: A Multisensor View , 2010 .

[39]  Maurice Herman,et al.  Cloud thermodynamical phase classification from the POLDER spaceborne instrument , 2000 .

[40]  Joyce E. Penner,et al.  Observational evidence of a change in radiative forcing due to the indirect aerosol effect , 2004, Nature.

[41]  G. Stephens,et al.  Many polarized radiative transfer models , 2010 .

[42]  Cornelis V. M. van der Mee,et al.  Fundamental relationships relevant to the transfer of polarized light in a scattering atmosphere , 1983 .

[43]  Jerome Riedi,et al.  Review of capabilities of multi-angle and polarization cloud measurements from POLDER , 2004 .

[44]  J. Hovenier.  The polarization of light scattered by small particles: a personal review , 2012 .

[45]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar , 1990 .

[46]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  Broken and inhomogeneous cloud impact on satellite cloud particle effective radius and cloud‐phase retrievals , 2010 .

[47]  Brian Cairns,et al.  Accuracy Assessments of Cloud Droplet Size Retrievals from Polarized Reflectance Measurements by the Research Scanning Polarimeter , 2012 .

[48]  Marie Doutriaux-Boucher,et al.  A comparison of cloud droplet radii measured from space , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[49]  Steven Platnick,et al.  An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands , 2011 .

[50]  Craig F. Bohren,et al.  Absorption and Scattering by a Sphere , 2007 .

[51]  J. Hansen,et al.  Light scattering in planetary atmospheres , 1974 .

[52]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Wide-Area Determination of Cloud Microphysical Properties from NOAA AVHRR Measurements for FIRE and ASTEX Regions , 1995 .

[53]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  How Do Aerosols Affect Cloudiness and Climate? , 2006, Science.

[54]  P. Daum,et al.  A Generalized Systems Theory for the Effect of Varying Fluctuations on Cloud Droplet Size Distributions , 2002 .

[55]  Christina Kluge,et al.  Data Reduction And Error Analysis For The Physical Sciences , 2016 .

[56]  Olivier Hagolle,et al.  PARASOL in-flight calibration and performance. , 2007, Applied optics.

[57]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Examining the impact of overlying aerosols on the retrieval of cloud optical properties from passive remote sensing , 2010 .

[58]  F. Bréon,et al.  Remote sensing of aerosols by using polarized, directional and spectral measurements within the A-Train: the PARASOL mission , 2011 .

[59]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase , 2000 .

[60]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part I: Sensitivity Analysis of the MODIS-Derived Cloud Droplet Sizes , 2010 .

[61]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Interpretation of Multiwavelength-Retrieved Droplet Effective Radii for Warm Water Clouds in Terms of In-Cloud Vertical Inhomogeneity by Using a Spectral Bin Microphysics Cloud Model , 2013 .

[62]  M. van der Mee,et al.  Transfer of Polarized Light in Planetary Atmospheres: Basic Concepts and Practical Methods , 2005 .

[63]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  The Effects of Scattering Angle and Cumulus Cloud Geometry on Satellite Retrievals of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[64]  J. W. Hovenier,et al.  The doubling method applied to multiple scattering of polarized light. , 1971 .

[65]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Liquid water cloud properties during the Polarimeter Definition Experiment (PODEX) , 2015 .

[66]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  The expected performance of cloud optical and microphysical properties derived from Suomi NPP VIIRS day/night band lunar reflectance , 2013 .

[67]  Liangfu Chen,et al.  Multiangular Polarized Characteristics of Cirrus Clouds at 1380 nm , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.