Dose and time as variables of toxicity.

Recognizing that if there is no exposure, there is no toxicity leads us to the conclusion that if there is exposure, toxicity can ensue when exposure exceeds a certain dose and/or time and that it will be dependent on toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Analysis of the fundamental description of toxicity (dT/dE=dT/dDxdD/dKxdK/dE, where T stands for toxicity, D for toxicodynamics, K for toxicokinetics and E for exposure) yields the recognition of three independent time scales, the first being an intrinsic property of a given compound (what does the chemical do to the organism), which is the dynamic time scale. The second time scale is an intrinsic property of a the organism (what does the organism do to the chemical), which represents the kinetic time scale. The frequency of exposure denotes the third time scale, which is independent of the dynamic and kinetic time scales. Frequency of exposure depends on the experimental design or on nature, but not on the organism or substance. A liminal condition occurs when the frequency becomes so high that it is indistinguishable from continuous exposure. Continuous exposure forces the two other time scales to become synchronized thereby reducing complexity to three variables: dose, effect and one time scale. Keeping one of those variables constant allows for the study of the other two variables reproducibly under isoeffective or isodosic or isotemporal conditions. However, any departure from continuous exposure will introduce the full complexity of four independent variables (dose and kinetic, dynamic and frequency time scales) impacting on the effect (dependent variable) at the same time. The examples discussed in this paper demonstrate how nature in the form of long half-lives provides liminal conditions when either kinetic or dynamic half lives force synchronization of all three time scales. However, for compounds having very short dynamic or kinetic half-lives, only continuous exposure will provide a synchronized time scale. A decision tree-type approach is being used to illustrate how to reduce the enormous complexity generated by five variables (dose, effect and up to three time scales) in toxicology to manageable proportions by identifying and modeling the rate-determining (-limiting) step(s) in the manifestation of toxicity.

[1]  J. Doull,et al.  GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY , 1998 .

[2]  W. Wirth,et al.  Zur Toxikologie der Lösungsmittel , 1933 .

[3]  C. I. Bliss The Relation between Exposure Time, Concentration and Toxicity in Experiments on Insecticides , 1940 .

[4]  D. Coffin,et al.  Role of time as a factor in the toxicity of chemical compounds in intermittent and continuous exposures. Part II. Effects of intermittent exposure. , 1977, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[5]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Complexity in biological signaling systems. , 1999, Science.

[6]  J. Busvine THE TOXICITY OF ETHYLENE OXIDE TO CALANDRA ORYZAE, C. GRANARIA, TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM, AND CIMEX LECTULARIUS , 1938 .

[7]  C Koch,et al.  Complexity and the nervous system. , 1999, Science.

[8]  R. Tardiff,et al.  Toxic Substances and Human Risk , 1987, Life Science Monographs.

[9]  R. Hartung Dose—Response Relationships , 1987 .

[10]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[11]  James F. Winchester,et al.  Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdose , 1998 .

[12]  K. Schramm,et al.  Subchronic/chronic toxicity of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD) in rats. Part I. Design, general observations, hematology, and liver concentrations. , 1997, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[13]  I. Ho,et al.  An assessment of comparative acute toxicity of diisopropyl-fluorophosphate, Tabun, Sarin, and Soman in relation to cholinergic and GABAergic enzyme activities in rats , 1984 .

[14]  K. Küpfmüller,et al.  Quantitative Analyse der Krebsentstehung , 1948 .

[15]  K. Rozman Delayed acute toxicity of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD), after oral administration, Obeys Haber's rule of inhalation toxicology. , 1999, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  H. Greim,et al.  A toxicologist's view of cancer risk assessment. , 1996, Drug metabolism reviews.

[17]  Quantitative definition of toxicity: a mathematical description of life and death with dose and time as variables. , 1998, Medical hypotheses.

[18]  F. J. Miller,et al.  Influence of exposure mode on the toxicity of NO2. , 1979, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  H. Greim,et al.  Relative potency of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDDs) in acute, subchronic and chronic (carcinogenicity) toxicity studies: implications for risk assessment of chemical mixtures. , 1993, Toxicology.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Complexity in chemistry. , 1999, Science.

[21]  K. Schramm,et al.  Subchronic/chronic toxicity of a mixture of four chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in rats. I. Design, general observations, hematology,and liver concentrations. , 1998, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[22]  P Grasso,et al.  Effects on 4080 rats of chronic ingestion of N-nitrosodiethylamine or N-nitrosodimethylamine: a detailed dose-response study. , 1991, Cancer research.