Internal knee derangement assessed with 3-minute three-dimensional isovoxel true FISP MR sequence: preliminary study.

PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the knee performed by using a three-dimensional (3D) isovoxel sequence involving an acquisition time of approximately 3 minutes, with surgery as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was institutional review board approved. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty knees of 29 patients (14 women, 15 men; mean age, 41 years) were prospectively examined by using a 3D isovoxel true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) sequence with water excitation and secondary multiplanar reformations. All patients underwent arthroscopy within 12 days after true FISP MR imaging. Two blinded readers evaluated the MR images. Accuracy for detection of cartilage defects and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscal tears, interobserver agreement, and intermethod agreement were calculated. RESULTS Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of isovoxel true FISP imaging for the diagnosis of cartilage defects were 45%, 83%, and 76%, respectively, for reader 1 and 63%, 82%, and 83%, respectively, for reader 2. Averaged (for readers 1 and 2) sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of isovoxel true FISP imaging were, respectively, 80%, 95%, and 90% for diagnosis of ACL tear; 100%, 82%, and 90% for diagnosis of medial meniscal tear; and 83%, 83%, and 83% for diagnosis of lateral meniscal tear. The standard MR sequences used at the authors' institution had overall sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of 39%, 83%, and 71%, respectively, for reader 1 and 37%, 85%, and 76%, respectively, for reader 2. Averaged sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the standard MR sequences were, respectively, 70%, 100%, and 90% for diagnosis of ACL tear; 96%, 77%, and 85% for diagnosis of medial meniscal tear; and 83%, 77%, and 78% for diagnosis of lateral meniscal tear. CONCLUSION The diagnostic performance of knee MR imaging performed by using a 3D water excitation isovoxel true FISP sequence and an imaging time of approximately 3 minutes is comparable to the diagnostic performance of the MR sequences used as standards at the authors' institution.

[1]  H. Bruhn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2‐weighted fast spin echo, T1‐weighted two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[2]  Walter F Block,et al.  Rapid fat‐suppressed isotropic steady‐state free precession imaging using true 3D multiple‐half‐echo projection reconstruction , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  O. Dietrich,et al.  High‐resolution renal MRA: Comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Rapid musculoskeletal MRI with phase-sensitive steady-state free precession: comparison with routine knee MRI. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  M G Myriam Hunink,et al.  MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Parallel imaging in cardiovascular MRI: methods and applications , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  S B Gay,et al.  Multiplanar Reconstruction in Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of the Knee: Comparison with Film Magnetic Resonance Interpretation , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Norbert J Pelc,et al.  Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession--initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  K. Kreitner,et al.  Rapid Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Integrated Parallel Acquisition Techniques (IPAT) - Initial Experiences , 2003, RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (Print).

[10]  D. Flamig,et al.  New method for fast MR imaging of the knee. , 1989, Radiology.

[11]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Toward single breath‐hold whole‐heart coverage coronary MRA using highly accelerated parallel imaging with a 32‐channel MR system , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Richard Kijowski,et al.  Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady‐state free precession imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  K. Wentz,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of standard orthogonal and tailored paracoronal images , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[14]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Usefulness of simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics technique for MRI of the knee. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Multiplanar reconstruction in MR imaging of the knee , 1998 .

[16]  K. Kreitner,et al.  Fast magnetic resonance imaging of the knee using a parallel acquisition technique (mSENSE): a prospective performance evaluation , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  J. Carrino,et al.  Trends in utilization: has extremity MR imaging replaced diagnostic arthroscopy? , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[19]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Kathryn Stevens,et al.  Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial‐spectral spoiled gradient‐echo vs. fat‐suppressed 3D spoiled gradient–echo MR imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  James C Carr,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: a pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms. , 2002, Academic radiology.