Pelvic Bone Asymmetry in 323 Study Participants Receiving Abdominal CT Scans

Study Design. Retrospective review of all CT scans of pelvis and abdomen performed at our institution in October and November 2000. Objective. To determine the prevalence and extent of radiographic pelvic asymmetry in a population of patients not preselected for having low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Pelvic asymmetry refers to asymmetric positioning of landmarks on the two sides of the pelvis and may have a structural or functional etiology. Pelvic asymmetry can be associated with the presence of true leg length discrepancy, lead to false diagnosis or inaccurate measurement of leg length discrepancy, or itself be independently associated with back pain. Although the prevalence of pelvic asymmetry has been reported in patients with back pain to be 24–91%, its prevalence in the general population is not known. Methods. A total of 323 consecutive CT scans of the pelvis/abdomen were assessed for pelvic asymmetry by one of three examiners. Pelvic asymmetry was defined as an unequal distance from the iliac crests to the acetabuli bilaterally, measured on the anteroposterior scout view of the CT scan. Measurements made on 30 randomly selected scans by the three examiners were used to assess interrater reliability of the measurement method. Results. Pelvic asymmetry ranged in magnitude from −11 mm to 7 mm [right pelvis (mm) − left pelvis (mm)]. Pelvic asymmetry was >5 mm in 17 of 323 (5.3%) and >10 mm in 2 of 323 (0.6%) of the subjects; 172 of 323 (53.3%) had a smaller right hemipelvis (mean asymmetry = −3.0 mm). A total of 95 of 323 (29.4%) had a smaller left hemipelvis (mean asymmetry = 2.1 mm). The intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] between the three observers was high (0.91). Conclusion. Pelvic asymmetry of >5 mm was uncommon, with a prevalence of approximately 5% in the population studied. CT scanography was found to be a practical and reliable method for the assessment of suspected pelvic asymmetry.

[1]  Edward B. Trachtman.  Principles of Manual Medicine , 1989 .

[2]  G. Selvik,et al.  Movements in the Sacroiliac Joints Demonstrated with Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry , 1978, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[3]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Mobility in the sacroiliac joints in the elderly: a kinematic and radiological study. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  A. Vleeming,et al.  A Radiostereometric Analysis of Movements of the Sacroiliac Joints During the Standing Hip Flexion Test , 2000, Spine.

[5]  H. Jacob,et al.  The mobility of the sacroiliac joints in healthy volunteers between 20 and 50 years of age. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  J. W. Fisk,et al.  Clinical and radiological assessment of leg length. , 1975, The New Zealand medical journal.

[7]  G. R. Clarke,et al.  Unequal leg length: an accurate method of detection and some clinical results. , 1972, Rheumatology and physical medicine.

[8]  D. Thickman,et al.  Comparison of orthoroentgenography and computed tomography in the measurement of limb-length discrepancy. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  A. Vleeming,et al.  A Radiostereometric Analysis of the Movements of the Sacroiliac Joints in the Reciprocal Straddle Position , 2000, Spine.

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  B. Ingelmark,et al.  Asymmetries of the lower extremities and pelvis and their relations to lumbar scoliosis. A radiographic study. , 1963, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[12]  G. Selvik,et al.  Movements of the Sacroiliac Joints: A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis , 1989, Spine.

[13]  H. Stam,et al.  The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[14]  W. Rush,et al.  A study of lower extremity length inequality. , 1946, The American journal of roentgenology and radium therapy.

[15]  J. Walker,et al.  Intratester and intertester reliability and validity of measures of innominate bone inclination. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[16]  P J NICHOLS,et al.  The Accuracy of Measuring Leg-length Differences , 1955, British medical journal.

[17]  O. Friberg,et al.  Clinical Symptoms and Biomechanics of Lumbar Spine and Hip Joint in Leg Length Inequality , 1983, Spine.

[18]  P. Levangie.  Four clinical tests of sacroiliac joint dysfunction: the association of test results with innominate torsion among patients with and without low back pain. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[19]  J. Gofton.  Persistent low back pain and leg length disparity. , 1985, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  R. Johnsson,et al.  Manipulation Does Not Alter the Position of the Sacroiliac Joint: A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[21]  Gofton Jp.  Persistent low back pain and leg length disparity. , 1985 .

[22]  H. Jacob,et al.  The mobility of the sacroiliac joint in healthy subjects. , 1996, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[23]  N. Bogduk,et al.  The Value of Medical History and Physical Examination in Diagnosing Sacroiliac Joint Pain , 1996, Spine.

[24]  I. Crombie.  Epidemiology of pain : a report of the Task Force on Epidemiology of the International Association for the Study of Pain , 1999 .

[25]  Kirby Rl,et al.  Pelvic ring mobility: assessed by stress radiography. , 1982 .

[26]  R. S. Myers.  Saunders manual of physical therapy practice , 1995 .

[27]  P. Levangie.  The association between static pelvic asymmetry and low back pain. , 1999, Spine.

[28]  S. Subotnick.  Limb length discrepancies of the lower extremity (the short leg syndrome). , 1981, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.