Hydraulic routing of extreme floods in a large ungauged river and the estimation of associated uncertainties: a case study of the Damodar River, India

Many developing countries are very vulnerable to flood risk since they are located in climatic zones characterised by extreme precipitation events, such as cyclones and heavy monsoon rainfall. Adequate flood mitigation requires a routing mechanism that can predict the dynamics of flood waves as they travel from source to flood-prone areas, and thus allow for early warning and adequate flood defences. A number of cutting edge hydrodynamic models have been developed in industrialised countries that can predict the advance of flood waves efficiently. These models are not readily applicable to flood prediction in developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, however, due to lack of data, particularly terrain and hydrological data. This paper explores the adaptations and adjustments that are essential to employ hydrodynamic models like LISFLOOD-FP to route very high-magnitude floods by utilising freely available Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission digital elevation model, available topographical maps and sparse network of river gauging stations. A 110 km reach of the lower Damodar River in eastern India was taken as the study area since it suffers from chronic floods caused by water release from upstream dams during intense monsoon storm events. The uncertainty in model outputs, which is likely to increase with coarse data inputs, was quantified in a generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation framework to demonstrate the level of confidence that one can have on such flood routing approaches. Validation results with an extreme flood event of 2009 reveal an encouraging index of agreement of 0.77 with observed records, while most of the observed time series records of a 2007 major flood were found to be within 95 % upper and lower uncertainty bounds of the modelled outcomes.

[1]  R. Panda,et al.  One Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling of River Flow Using DEM Extracted River Cross-sections , 2010 .

[2]  Yuri Gorokhovich,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics , 2006 .

[3]  Ahmed El-Mowafy,et al.  Analysis of Web-Based GNSS Post-Processing Services for Static and Kinematic Positioning Using Short Data Spans , 2011 .

[4]  Xixi Lu,et al.  Application of Remote Sensing in Flood Management with Special Reference to Monsoon Asia: A Review , 2004 .

[5]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[6]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography , 1984 .

[7]  Narendra Singh Raghuwanshi,et al.  Hydrodynamic modelling of a large flood‐prone river system in India with limited data , 2009 .

[8]  P. Bates,et al.  Predicting floodplain inundation: raster‐based modelling versus the finite‐element approach , 2001 .

[9]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE , 2002 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. , 2006 .

[11]  David E. Smith,et al.  The Development of the NASA GSFC and NIMA Joint Geopotential Model , 1997 .

[12]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[13]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[14]  B. Sanders Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling , 2007 .

[15]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Modeling large‐scale inundation of Amazonian seasonally flooded wetlands , 2007 .

[16]  A. Casas,et al.  The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modelling , 2006 .

[17]  S. Chandra INDIA : FLOOD MANAGEMENT-DAMODAR RIVER BASIN , 2004 .

[18]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  Spatial statistics and models , 1984 .

[19]  H. Riedwyl Goodness of Fit , 1967 .

[20]  Sanat Kumar Guchhait,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic variability due to dam constructions and emerging problems: a case study of Damodar River, West Bengal, India , 2014, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[21]  V. T. Chow Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[22]  J. Garbrecht,et al.  Hydrologic Channel‐Flow Routing for Compound Sections , 1991 .

[23]  Hannes Isaak Reuter,et al.  A first assessment of Aster GDEM tiles for absolute accuracy, relative accuracy and terrain parameters , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[24]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Validation of SRTM Elevations Over Vegetated and Non-vegetated Terrain Using Medium-Footprint Lidar , 2006 .

[25]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[26]  G. Kroenung,et al.  The SRTM Data Finishing Process and Products , 2006 .

[27]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[28]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[29]  Keith J. Beven,et al.  Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future?: An Introduction to Techniques for Uncertainty Estimation in Environmental Prediction , 2010 .

[30]  R. Paiva,et al.  Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach , 2011 .

[31]  H. Mackay,et al.  National flood modelling for insurance purposes: using IFSAR for flood risk estimation in Europe , 2005 .

[32]  K. Beven Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[33]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Two-dimensional numerical assessment of the hydrodynamics of the Nile swamps in southern Sudan , 2010 .

[34]  I. Alcántara-Ayala Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries , 2002 .

[35]  P. Bates,et al.  Utility of different data types for calibrating flood inundation models within a GLUE framework , 2005 .

[36]  P. Bates,et al.  Amazon flood wave hydraulics , 2009 .

[37]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration , 2005 .

[38]  J. Brandão,et al.  Flood Control in the Cuiabá River Basin, Brazil, with Multipurpose Reservoir Operation , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[39]  P. Bates,et al.  The impact of uncertainty in satellite data on the assessment of flood inundation models , 2012 .

[40]  M. Tsakiri,et al.  GPS Processing Using Online Services , 2008 .

[41]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[42]  N. Raghuwanshi,et al.  Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data , 2009 .

[43]  J. Neal,et al.  Evaluating a new LISFLOOD‐FP formulation with data from the summer 2007 floods in Tewkesbury, UK , 2011 .

[44]  P. Bates,et al.  Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modelling , 2006 .

[45]  Will Featherstone,et al.  How well can online GPS PPP post-processing services be used to establish geodetic survey control networks? , 2008 .

[46]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Data Utilization in Flood Inundation Modelling , 2010 .

[47]  S. Saha River-Basin Planning in the Damodar Valley of India , 1979 .