The normative aspect of signalling and the distinction between performative and constative

Abstract The paper outlines an approach to the formal representation of signalling conventions, emphasising the prominent role played therein by a particular type of normative modality. It is then argued that, in terms of inferencing related to this modality, a solution can be given to the task J.L. Austin set but failed to resolve: finding a criterion for distinguishing between what Austin called constatives and performatives. The remainder of the paper indicates the importance of the normative modality in understanding a closely related issue: reasoning about trust in communication scenarios; this, in turn, facilitates a clear formal articulation of the role of a Trusted Third Party in trade communication.

[1]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  On Representing Special Languages with FLBC: Message Markers and Reference Fixing in SeaSpeak , 2005 .

[2]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Ethics , 2008 .

[3]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Reasoning about the objects of attitudes and operators: towards a disquotation theory for representation of propositional content , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[4]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  On Lean Messaging with Unfolding and Unwrapping for Electronic Commerce , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[5]  Xavier Parent,et al.  Conventional Signalling Acts and Conversation , 2003, Workshop on Agent Communication Languages.

[6]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  A Convention-Based Approach to a Formal Language for Business Communication , 2006 .

[7]  Erik Stenius,et al.  Mood and language-game , 1967, Synthese.

[8]  Andrew J. I. Jones.  Communication and Meaning: An Essay in Applied Modal Logic , 1983 .

[9]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[10]  J. Sadock.  Speech acts , 2007 .

[11]  David M. Eyers,et al.  Introducing the fair and logical trade project , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[12]  C. E. Alchourrón,et al.  Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin , 1997 .

[13]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  EDI, XML, and the Transparency Problem in Electronic Commerce , 2005 .

[14]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  On automated message processing in electronic commerce and work support systems: speech act theory and expressive felicity , 1997, TOIS.

[15]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  On the Normative Aspect of Signalling Conventions , 2006, DEON.

[16]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[17]  Xavier Parent,et al.  A Convention-based Approach to Agent Communication Languages , 2007 .

[18]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. , 1965 .

[19]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[20]  Munindar P. Singh.  Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles , 1998, Computer.

[21]  Victoria Peters.  EDI , 2001 .

[22]  Andrew J. I. Jones.  On Normative-Informational Positions , 2004, DEON.

[23]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  A note on interpretations for federated languages and the use of disquotation , 2005, ICAIL '05.

[24]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  A Note on Modelling Speech Acts as Signalling Conventions , 2005 .

[25]  S. Kimbrough.  A Note on the Good Samaritan Paradox and the Disquotation Theory of Propositional Content , 2002 .

[26]  Steven O. Kimbrough,et al.  Formal Modelling in Electronic Commerce , 2005 .

[27]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  A logical model of social commitment for agent communication , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[28]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .