Species identification and quantification in meat and meat products using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

Species fraud and product mislabelling in processed food, albeit not being a direct health issue, often results in consumer distrust. Therefore methods for quantification of undeclared species are needed. Targeting mitochondrial DNA, e.g. CYTB gene, for species quantification is unsuitable, due to a fivefold inter-tissue variation in mtDNA content per cell resulting in either an under- (-70%) or overestimation (+160%) of species DNA contents. Here, we describe a reliable two-step droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting the nuclear F2 gene for precise quantification of cattle, horse, and pig in processed meat products. The ddPCR assay is advantageous over qPCR showing a limit of quantification (LOQ) and detection (LOD) in different meat products of 0.01% and 0.001%, respectively. The specificity was verified in 14 different species. Hence, determining F2 in food by ddPCR can be recommended for quality assurance and control in production systems.

[1]  M. Maher,et al.  GUIDELINES ON PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND VALIDATION OF METHODS FOR DETECTION, IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC DNA SEQUENCES AND SPECIFIC PROTEINS IN FOODS , 2010 .

[2]  A. Parente,et al.  Myoglobin as marker in meat adulteration: a UPLC method for determining the presence of pork meat in raw beef burger. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[3]  B. Charrier,et al.  Real-time PCR: what relevance to plant studies? , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  Shinji Katsura,et al.  Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion. , 2003, Journal of biotechnology.

[5]  Benjamin J. Hindson,et al.  Evaluation of a Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Format for DNA Copy Number Quantification , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Betsy B Woodward,et al.  Detection of Species Substitution in Raw and Cooked Meats Using Immunoassays. , 1995, Journal of food protection.

[7]  Alexandra S. Whale,et al.  Methods for Applying Accurate Digital PCR Analysis on Low Copy DNA Samples , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  M. Baker Digital PCR hits its stride , 2012, Nature Methods.

[9]  F. Vogensen,et al.  Species determination - Can we detect and quantify meat adulteration? , 2009, Meat science.

[10]  Dietrich Maede A strategy for molecular species detection in meat and meat products by PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing using mitochondrial and chromosomal genetic sequences , 2006 .

[11]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Copy Number Variation in a DNA Sample Using Digital PCR on a Nanofluidic Device , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  E. Robin,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA molecules and virtual number of mitochondria per cell in mammalian cells , 1988, Journal of cellular physiology.

[13]  T. Davoli,et al.  The causes and consequences of polyploidy in normal development and cancer. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[14]  S Muroya,et al.  A quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assay. , 1999, Meat science.

[15]  Fumio Inagaki,et al.  Molecular quantification of environmental DNA using microfluidics and digital PCR. , 2012, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[16]  K. Livak,et al.  Real time quantitative PCR. , 1996, Genome research.

[17]  M. Schauzu,et al.  Methods for the detection of beef and pork in foods using real-time polymerase chain reaction , 2003 .

[18]  Mojca Milavec,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Food and Feed Samples with Droplet Digital PCR , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  H. Broll,et al.  Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real‐time PCR , 2007 .

[20]  S. Singh,et al.  Detection of pork adulteration by highly-specific PCR assay of mitochondrial D-loop. , 2014, Food chemistry.

[21]  Y. Ayaz,et al.  DETECTION OF SPECIES IN MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS USING ENZYME‐LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY , 2006 .

[22]  Jeff Mellen,et al.  High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy Number , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Ie-Ming Shih,et al.  Principle and applications of digital PCR , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.