Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up.

OBJECTIVES This study compared the long-term clinical results of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with internal thoracic artery grafts with those in patients with vein grafts only. BACKGROUND Aortocoronary artery bypass surgery has been performed for > 25 years, primarily utilizing the saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery as conduits. Although the internal thoracic artery has been shown to confer a clinical advantage, it is not known for how many years this benefit will continue. METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing initial coronary artery bypass surgery between 1970 and 1973 were followed for up to 20 years. Clinical evaluation included survival, late myocardial infarction, need for reoperation and recurrence of angina. Patients were analyzed in three groups: vein grafts only (214 patients); a single internal thoracic artery graft with or without associated vein grafts (490 patients); and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts (39 patients). Use of the operating microscope was also analyzed with regard to effect on survival. RESULTS The internal thoracic artery graft and use of the operating microscope were independent predictors of mortality and reduced the risk of dying by a factor of 0.68 and 0.76, respectively. An internal thoracic artery graft resulted in a mean survival of 4.4 years longer than that with vein grafts alone. The internal thoracic artery graft compared with vein grafts was associated with fewer reoperations (p < 0.001), fewer late myocardial infarctions, lower associated mortality rates (p < 0.04) and less early recurrence of angina (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The internal thoracic artery graft and use of the operating microscope confer a superior clinical advantage over the saphenous vein graft throughout a 20-year follow-up period. The advantage of an internal thoracic artery graft does not decrease with time, suggesting that the choice of conduit at the initial operation is more important clinically than progression of coronary artery disease.

[1]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Loss of the improvement of angina between 1 and 7 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery: correlations with changes in vein grafts and in coronary arteries. , 1979, Circulation.

[2]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  B. Lytle.  Long-term results of coronary bypass surgery. Is the internal mammary artery graft superior? , 1988, Postgraduate medicine.

[4]  F. Loop,et al.  Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  C. Bavor,et al.  Saphenous vein coronary bypass graft revisited. , 1987, American heart journal.

[6]  G. E. Green,et al.  Bypass surgery with the internal mammary artery graft: 15 year follow-up. , 1986, Circulation.

[7]  P. Kurlansky,et al.  Coronary bypass grafting in the elderly. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  R. Favaloro,et al.  Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion: operative technique. , 1968, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  G. E. Green,et al.  Aortocoronary bypass surgery: a 7-year follow-up. , 1979, Circulation.

[10]  F. Loop,et al.  Reoperation after previous grafting with the internal mammary artery: technique and early results. , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. , 1985, Circulation.

[12]  L. Klein,et al.  Prognostic significance of severe narrowing of the proximal portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  B. Bulkley,et al.  Preponderance of acute proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial lesions in fatal myocardial infarction: a clinicopathologic study. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  G. E. Green,et al.  Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study experience. , 1988, Circulation.

[15]  G. Lawrie,et al.  Long-term results of coronary bypass surgery. Analysis of 1698 patients followed 15 to 20 years. , 1991, Annals of surgery.

[16]  S. Stertzer,et al.  Coronary arterial bypass grafts. , 1968, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  D. Pennington,et al.  Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Actuarial analysis of surgical results: rationale and method. , 1977, The Annals of thoracic surgery.