Ontology-based modelling of lifecycle underground utility information to support operation and maintenance

Abstract Operation and maintenance (O&M) of underground utilities is crucial to ensure normal functionality of utilities by performing different inspection and maintenance activities. A variety of data are required by maintenance staff to evaluate utility condition and make decisions in planning maintenance works. Nevertheless, data required for utility O&M are usually originated from different sources, with various formats or representations. Interpreting and integrating such heterogenous data for utility O&M remains a significant challenge. Therefore, this paper proposes an ontology-based framework for modelling lifecycle utility information such as to facilitate activities and support decision making during utility O&M. The framework consists of (1) a data layer to collect various types of utility lifecycle data, (2) a knowledge layer to extract common mechanisms and methods for utility O&M, (3) an ontology layer where a domain ontology, Utility Operation and Maintenance Ontology (UOMO), is developed with entities and semantic rules to represent different categories of information related to utility projects, (4) an application layer to automate manual tasks and support decision making by leveraging the query and reasoning capability of ontology. To validate the framework, a case study is performed using real-world inspection data where a user interface is developed to allow users to implement different functions without technical knowledge. The case study demonstrates that the framework can, efficiently and automatically, extract and integrate various information to assist different activities, e.g. defect rating, condition assessment and validation, as well as to support decision making in prioritizing maintenance works, and selecting appropriate maintenance methods. This study contributes by proposing the first ontology-based framework for improving efficiency in utility O&M, where the query and semantic reasoning capabilities of the ontology are fully utilized. The developed ontology with lifecycle utility information is expected to facilitate data interoperability in the utility domain and can be extended with other knowledge for large-scale infrastructure management.

[1]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  MODELLING BELOW- AND ABOVE-GROUND UTILITY NETWORK FEATURES WITH THE CITYGML UTILITY NETWORK ADE: EXPERIENCES FROM ROTTERDAM , 2018, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[3]  Di Sivo Michele,et al.  Decision-support tools for municipal infrastructure maintenance management , 2011, WCIT.

[4]  Jun Xiao,et al.  Ontology-Based Knowledge Model to Support Construction Noise Control in China , 2018 .

[5]  Hubo Cai,et al.  Ontology and rule-based natural language processing approach for interpreting textual regulations on underground utility infrastructure , 2021, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[6]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Development of an IFC-based data schema for the design information representation of the NATM tunnel , 2016 .

[7]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Integrated 3D Modeling of Multi-utility Networks and Their Interdependencies for Critical Infrastructure Analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Nora El-Gohary,et al.  Domain Ontology for Processes in Infrastructure and Construction , 2010 .

[9]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  A unified convolutional neural network integrated with conditional random field for pipe defect segmentation , 2019, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Juan Pablo Rodríguez,et al.  Sewer asset management – state of the art and research needs , 2019, Urban Water Journal.

[11]  Ikhlas Abdel-Qader,et al.  An imaging data model for concrete bridge inspection , 2004 .

[12]  G. Agugiaro,et al.  DATA MODELING FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITY NETWORKS: IMPLEMENTATION AND TESTING , 2020, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[13]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Modeling Information for Maintenance and Safety along the Lifecycle of Road Tunnels , 2016 .

[14]  Vineet R. Kamat,et al.  Geospatial Databases and Augmented Reality Visualization for Improving Safety in Urban Excavation Operations , 2010 .

[15]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  Automated detection of sewer pipe defects in closed-circuit television images using deep learning techniques , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[16]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A reliability-based optimization scheme for maintenance management in large-scale bridge networks , 2015 .

[17]  Anne-Françoise Cutting-Decelle,et al.  Ontology-based approaches for improving the interoperability between 3D urban models , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[18]  Jack Q. Zhao,et al.  Condition assessment and rehabilitation of large sewers , 2020 .

[19]  Junxiang Zhu,et al.  BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management , 2020, Ann. GIS.

[20]  Celson Lima,et al.  Domain Taxonomy for Construction Concepts: Toward a Formal Ontology for Construction Knowledge , 2005 .

[21]  Xin Xu,et al.  Semantic Frame-Based Information Extraction from Utility Regulatory Documents to Support Compliance Checking , 2018, Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering.

[22]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  Distributed Ontology Architecture for Knowledge Management in Highway Construction , 2005 .

[23]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Mapping between BIM and 3D GIS in different levels of detail using schema mediation and instance comparison , 2016 .

[24]  H. M. Osman,et al.  Knowledge-Enabled Decision Support System for Routing Urban Utilities , 2011 .

[25]  Xin Xu,et al.  Ontology-Based Knowledge Management System for Digital Highway Construction Inspection , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[26]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  IFC Extension for Road Structures and Digital Modeling , 2011 .

[27]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Automated structural defects diagnosis in underground transportation tunnels using semantic technologies , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[28]  Xin Xu,et al.  Semantic approach to compliance checking of underground utilities , 2020 .

[29]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  An ontological engineering approach for integrating CAD and GIS in support of infrastructure management , 2006, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[30]  Oh-Seong Kwon,et al.  A framework for proactive construction defect management using BIM, augmented reality and ontology-based data collection template , 2013 .

[31]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  An integrated underground utility management and decision support based on BIM and GIS , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[32]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  A domain ontology for construction concepts in urban infrastructure products , 2011 .

[33]  Andrew T. Brint,et al.  The rise, current position and future direction of asset management in utility industries , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[34]  Dan Orfeo,et al.  Enhancing ground penetrating radar with augmented reality systems for underground utility management , 2020, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[35]  David A. McMeekin,et al.  a Proposal to Use Semantic Web Technologies for Improved Road Network Information Exchange , 2018 .

[36]  ter Huurne.  Modelling utilities by developing a domain ontology , 2019 .

[37]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  A decision support system for urban infrastructure inter-asset management employing domain ontologies and qualitative uncertainty-based reasoning , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Integrating building and urban semantics to empower smart water solutions , 2017 .

[39]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Water utility decision support through the semantic web of things , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  M. Usmen,et al.  Integration of Digital Technologies into Underground Utility Asset Management , 2020, Open Journal of Civil Engineering.

[41]  Gaihua Fu.  Seeing the Unseen: delivering integrated underground utility data in the UK , 2009 .

[42]  Jun Wang,et al.  A linked data system framework for sharing construction defect information using ontologies and BIM environments , 2016 .

[43]  Leonid Stoimenov,et al.  Methodology and intermediate layer for the automatic creation of ontology instances stored in relational databases , 2013, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[44]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[45]  G. Agugiaro,et al.  NETWORK MODELLING AND SEMANTIC 3D CITY MODELS: TESTING THE MATURITY OF THE UTILITY NETWORK ADE FOR CITYGML WITH A WATER NETWORK TEST CASE , 2018, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[46]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A semantic modeling approach for the automated detection and interpretation of structural damage , 2021 .

[47]  H. David Jeong,et al.  Interlinking life-cycle data spaces to support decision making in highway asset management , 2016 .

[48]  Pieter Pauwels,et al.  Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: A literature overview , 2017 .

[49]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  Toward the Internet of Underground Things: A Systematic Survey , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[50]  Rui Ding,et al.  Building an ontological knowledgebase for bridge maintenance , 2019, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[51]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Semantic 3D modeling of multi-utility networks in cities for analysis and 3D visualization , 2013 .

[52]  Xin Xu,et al.  Domain Ontology for Utility Infrastructure: Coupling the Semantics of CityGML Utility Network ADE and Domain Glossaries , 2021, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[53]  Sergej Muhic,et al.  SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: Overview, Information Delivery Manual and Model View Definition , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[54]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Development of a cooperative management framework for bridge maintenance using IFC data model , 2010 .

[55]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: Towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA) , 2015 .

[56]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Extending Semantic 3D City Models by Supply and Disposal Networks for Analysing the Urban Supply Situation , 2016 .