Putting words in their mouths: The alignment of identities with system goals through the use of Individual Learning Plans

This article analyses the role of Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) in teachers' work in the Skills for Life sector. It shows how ILPs, originally a means of formative assessment, have become part of a system of performance indicators and function as a key mediating mechanism between local interactions and system goals. The article draws on theoretical perspectives from the new literacy studies and the sociology of science to reveal the pivotal role of texts in projects of social ordering. The methodology is a version of institutional ethnography, whereby an artefact (the ILP) is tracked as it circulates across the different sites of its production and use. Documentary and interview evidence are used. The article concludes that, in its current form, the ILP shapes teaching and learning relationships and aligns both tutor and student identities. Permissive guidance, combined with a core curriculum, the demands of audit and inspection, positions tutors uncomfortably as active mediators between student experience and the policy discourse.

[1]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[2]  Ron Scollon,et al.  Mediated Discourse: The nexus of practice , 2001 .

[3]  Nancy Darcovich.  Literacy in the information age : final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey , 2000 .

[4]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy , 2000 .

[5]  D. Holland.  Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[6]  F. Coffield.  Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review , 2004 .

[7]  J. Gee,et al.  The New Work Order , 1996 .

[8]  Deborah Brandt.  Writing for a Living , 2005 .

[9]  G. McCulloch,et al.  Teachers and the National Curriculum , 1999 .

[10]  Nina Spada,et al.  语言学习机制=How languages are learned , 1995 .

[11]  N. Zepke,et al.  Learners' perceptions of assessment: Tensions between philosophy and practice , 2000 .

[12]  Helen Colley,et al.  Unbecoming teachers: towards a more dynamic notion of professional participation , 2007 .

[13]  Lawrence Angus *.  Globalization and educational change: bringing about the reshaping and re‐norming of practice , 2004 .

[14]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Changing faces of adult literacy, numeracy and ESOL. , 2004 .

[15]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[16]  Jane Perryman.  Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures , 2006 .

[17]  P. Webb.  The choreography of accountability , 2006 .

[18]  Dorothy Holland,et al.  History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities , 2001 .

[19]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[20]  J. Avis.  Beyond performativity: reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education , 2005 .

[21]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations , 2003 .

[22]  Katherine A. Clinton,et al.  Limits of the Local: Expanding Perspectives on Literacy as a Social Practice , 2002 .

[23]  B. Schutt.  Sorting things out. , 1970, The American journal of nursing.

[24]  G. Smart.  The new work order: behind the language of the new capitalism , 2000 .

[25]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[26]  M. DeVault,et al.  36 Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations , 2001 .

[27]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Under new management: changing conceptions of teacher professionalism and policy in the further education sector , 1999 .

[28]  Cathleen D. Rafferty.  Literacy in the Information Age. , 1999 .

[29]  Juliet Merrifield,et al.  Contested Ground: Performance Accountability in Adult Basic Education. NCSALL Report #1. , 1998 .

[30]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[31]  Mary Beth Krouse.  :Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations , 2000 .

[32]  B. Langer,et al.  The Practice of Everyday Life , 2019, Forms of Thinking in Leopardi’s Zibaldone.

[33]  R. Pringle,et al.  Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling , 1991 .

[34]  L. Farrell.  The ‘new word order’: workplace education and the textual practice of economic globalization , 2001 .

[35]  Mary Hamilton,et al.  Privileged Literacies: Policy, Institutional Process and the Life of the IALS , 2001 .

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[37]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[38]  Kathryn Ecclestone,et al.  Learning Autonomy in Post-16 Education: The Policy and Practice of Formative Assessment , 2003 .

[39]  M. Belfiore.  Reading Work: Literacies in the New Workplace , 2004 .

[40]  S. Ball.  The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity , 2003 .

[41]  Yvonne Hillier,et al.  Informal Practitioner Theory: Eliciting the Implicit. , 1998 .

[42]  Stuart Hall,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SCOTTISH ADULT LITERACY AND NUMERACY (ALN) STRATEGY FINAL REPORT , 2006 .

[43]  J. Clarke.  A new kind of symmetry: Actor-network theories and the new literacy studies , 2002 .

[44]  E.,et al.  ETHNOGRAPHY IN / OF THE WORLD SYSTEM : The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography , 2002 .

[45]  D. Smith.  Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling , 1990 .

[46]  H. Scheeres,et al.  From Doing Work to Talking Work: Renegotiating Knowing, Doing, and Identity , 2003 .

[47]  David Barton,et al.  Literacy, reification and the dynamics of social interaction. , 2005 .

[48]  N. Jackson.  Writing-Up People at Work: Investigations of Workplace Literacy. , 2000 .

[49]  H. De Vroom,et al.  Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) , 2006 .

[50]  N. Jackson.  Adult Literacy Policy: Mind the GAP , 2005 .