Prompting Prosocial Human Interventions in Response to Robot Mistreatment

Inspired by the benefits of human prosocial behavior, we explore whether prosocial behavior can be extended to a Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) context. More specifically, we study whether robots can induce prosocial behavior in humans through a 1x2 between-subjects user study (N=30) in which a confederate abused a robot. Through this study, we investigated whether the emotional reactions of a group of bystander robots could motivate a human to intervene in response to robot abuse. Our results show that participants were more likely to prosocially intervene when the bystander robots expressed sadness in response to the abuse as opposed to when they ignored these events, despite participants reporting similar perception of robot mistreatment and levels of empathy for the abused robot. Our findings demonstrate possible effects of group social influence through emotional cues by robots in human-robot interaction. They reveal a need for further research regarding human prosocial behavior within HRI.

[1]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Engineering Pro-Sociality With Autonomous Agents , 2018, AAAI.

[2]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Three's company, or a crowd?: The effects of robot number and behavior on HRI in Japan and the USA , 2015, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[3]  M. Kret,et al.  Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Bioluminescence-Inspired Human-Robot Interaction : Designing Expressive Lights that Affect Human’s Willingness to Interact with a Robot , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  Emulating Empathy in Socially Assistive Robotics , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[7]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Robot abuse : a limitation of the media equation , 2005 .

[9]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Playing a different imitation game: Interaction with an Empathic Android Robot , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[10]  Ron Alterovitz,et al.  Robot Planning in the Real World: Research Challenges and Opportunities , 2016, AI Mag..

[11]  Kolja Kühnlenz,et al.  Effect of Explicit Emotional Adaptation on Prosocial Behavior of Humans towards Robots depends on Prior Robot Experience , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[12]  Peter Wittenburg,et al.  ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research , 2006, LREC.

[13]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  Empathic Robot for Group Learning , 2019, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.

[14]  Björn W. Schuller,et al.  Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy , 2018, Science Robotics.

[15]  Soomin Lee,et al.  Designing Shelly, a Robot Capable of Assessing and Restraining Children's Robot Abusing Behaviors , 2018, HRI.

[16]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[17]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Using Empathy to Improve Human-Robot Relationships , 2010, HRPR.

[18]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Empathizing with robots: Fellow feeling along the anthropomorphic spectrum , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.

[19]  KandaTakayuki,et al.  The network robot system , 2013, HRI 2013.

[20]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Humans Conform to Robots: Disambiguating Trust, Truth, and Conformity , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  C. Salmivalli.  Participant Roles in Bullying: How Can Peer Bystanders Be Utilized in Interventions? , 2014 .

[22]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Do Synchronized Multiple Robots Exert Peer Pressure? , 2016, HAI.

[23]  Examining the Effectiveness of School-Bullying Intervention Programs Globally: a Meta-analysis , 2019, International Journal of Bullying Prevention.

[24]  Kolja Kühnlenz,et al.  An emotional adaption approach to increase helpfulness towards a robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  David F. Gruber.  Three's company , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[26]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[27]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Situational Context Directs How People Affectively Interpret Robotic Non-Linguistic Utterances , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[29]  J. Paul Sorrels,et al.  Conformity by Omission , 1984 .

[30]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[31]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[32]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Mindless Robots get Bullied , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[33]  Katherine B. Martin,et al.  Facial Action Coding System , 2015 .

[34]  Kelly Caine,et al.  Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI , 2016, CHI.

[35]  M. Levandowsky,et al.  Distance between Sets , 1971, Nature.

[36]  Paolo Dario,et al.  How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[37]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[38]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Rabble of Robots Effects: Number and Type of Robots Modulates Attitudes, Emotions, and Stereotypes , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[39]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  The network robot system: enabling social human-robot interaction in public spaces , 2013, HRI 2013.

[40]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[41]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Improving human-human collaboration between children with a social robot , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[42]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  OpenFace 2.0: Facial Behavior Analysis Toolkit , 2018, 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018).

[43]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[44]  Elisa Poskiparta,et al.  Bystanders Matter: Associations Between Reinforcing, Defending, and the Frequency of Bullying Behavior in Classrooms , 2011, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[45]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[46]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[47]  J. Lochman,et al.  Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology , 2011 .

[48]  Petr Slovák,et al.  “Stop. I See a Conflict Happening.” A Robot Mediator for Young Children’s Interpersonal Conflict Resolution , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[49]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  A peer pressure experiment: Recreation of the Asch conformity experiment with robots , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[50]  Monica Perusquía-Hernández,et al.  Robot mirroring: A framework for self-tracking feedback through empathy with an artificial agent representing the self , 2019, ArXiv.

[51]  Aaron Steinfeld,et al.  Inducing Bystander Interventions During Robot Abuse with Social Mechanisms , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[52]  Jamie Poston,et al.  Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[53]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Why Do Children Abuse Robots? , 2015, HRI.

[54]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Escaping from Children’s Abuse of Social Robots , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).