Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application

Evidence generated from randomized controlled trials forms the foundation of cardiovascular therapeutics and has led to the adoption of numerous drugs and devices that prolong survival and reduce morbidity, as well as the avoidance of interventions that have been shown to be ineffective or even unsafe. Many aspects of cardiovascular research have evolved considerably since the first randomized trials in cardiology were conducted. In order to be large enough to provide reliable evidence about effects on major outcomes, cardiovascular trials may now involve thousands of patients recruited from hundreds of clinical sites in many different countries. Costly infrastructure has developed to meet the increasingly complex organizational and operational requirements of these clinical trials. Concerns have been raised that this approach is unsustainable, inhibiting the reliable evaluation of new and existing treatments, to the detriment of patient care. These issues were considered by patients, regulators, funders, and trialists at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Roundtable in October 2015. This paper summarizes the key insights and discussions from the workshop, highlights subsequent progress, and identifies next steps to produce meaningful change in the conduct of cardiovascular clinical research.

[1]  M. Landray,et al.  Improving clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases: a position paper from the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  J. McMurray,et al.  Large streamlined trials in cardiovascular disease. , 2014, European heart journal.

[3]  Elizabeth Warren Strengthening Research through Data Sharing. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  Embedding cardiovascular research into practice. , 2013, JAMA.

[5]  Jeppe Ragnar Andersen,et al.  Impact of source data verification on data quality in clinical trials: an empirical post hoc analysis of three phase 3 randomized clinical trials. , 2015, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  Impediments to Clinical Research in the United States , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  David Erlinge,et al.  Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Horn,et al.  Proposed Rules , 2000 .

[9]  Catrin Tudur Smith,et al.  The Value of Source Data Verification in a Cancer Clinical Trial , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  P. Graham,et al.  Good intentions and ICH-GCP: Trial conduct training needs to go beyond the ICH-GCP document and include the intention-to-treat principle , 2014, Clinical trials.

[11]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Sharing Data from Cardiovascular Clinical Trials--A Proposal. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Challenges to Data Monitoring Committees When Regulatory Authorities Intervene. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  James D Neaton,et al.  Monitoring the quality of conduct of clinical trials: a survey of current practices , 2011, Clinical trials.

[14]  M. Landray,et al.  Randomized clinical trials--removing unnecessary obstacles. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Archdeacon,et al.  Optimizing Expedited Safety Reporting for Drugs and Biologics Subject to an Investigational New Drug Application , 2013, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[16]  Canary Wharf,et al.  Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials , 2013 .

[17]  David Moher,et al.  The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research , 2005, The Lancet.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Toward Fairness in Data Sharing. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds. , 2016, Circulation.

[20]  Russell L. Rothman,et al.  The ADAPTABLE Trial and PCORnet: Shining Light on a New Research Paradigm , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  A. Abacı [Championing cardiovascular health innovation in Europe]. , 2013, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.

[22]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costs , 2008, Clinical trials.

[23]  Sarah Parish,et al.  Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Joy Adamson,et al.  The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[25]  Tomasz Burzykowski,et al.  A statistical approach to central monitoring of data quality in clinical trials , 2012, Clinical trials.

[26]  R. Horton Offline: Data sharing—why editors may have got it wrong , 2016, The Lancet.

[27]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 1993, Research on social work practice.

[28]  R. Califf,et al.  The future of cardiovascular clinical research in North America and beyond-addressing challenges and leveraging opportunities through unique academic and grassroots collaborations. , 2015, American heart journal.

[29]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Refining calcium test for diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer: cutoffs, procedures and safety , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  J. Abraham The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[32]  P. Scardino,et al.  The clinically-integrated randomized trial: proposed novel method for conducting large trials at low cost , 2009, Trials.

[33]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the test , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project--A Mechanism for Data Sharing. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  S. Khozin,et al.  The Majority of Expedited Investigational New Drug Safety Reports Are Uninformative , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  M. Landray,et al.  Clinical Trials: Rethinking How We Ensure Quality , 2012 .

[37]  H L Greene,et al.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, The Lancet.

[40]  Jon Brumbaugh,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , 2000 .

[41]  A. Cohen,et al.  The return of the prodigal son and the extraordinary development route of antibody TGN1412 ‐ lessons for drug development and clinical pharmacology , 2015, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[42]  Frank Rockhold,et al.  Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  M. Rawlins De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions , 2008, The Lancet.

[44]  John Fletcher,et al.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[45]  Taghrid Obied,et al.  Oversight of clinical investigations- A risk based approach to monitoring , 2014 .