Analysis of cement-bonded materials by multi-cycle mercury intrusion and nitrogen sorption.

The pore systems of cement-based materials are studied by N(2) sorption and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Pore size distributions and internal surfaces are derived. Especially in materials with a broad pore size distribution, these (and other) methods generally do not lead to coincident results. It is shown here, how the interpretation of the experimental data of the two methods may be modified in order to obtain coincident pore size distributions from both methods. The studied pore systems are described as array of chambers which are connected by smaller throats. N(2) adsorption is used to calculate the size of the pores, whereby no distinction between throat or chamber type is possible with this method. Assuming mercury entrapping in ink-bottle type pores (pores that are connected to an external surface through smaller pores only) being the dominant process for mercury snap-off during extrusion and applying multi-cycle MIP, the calculation of the size of the entrances of these ink-bottles is possible. It is shown that similar results also may be derived from mercury extrusion data by applying a contact angle correction for the retracting mercury meniscus. A good agreement of the pore size distribution of the connected, non-ink-bottle type pores derived from either N(2) sorption or mercury intrusion is obtained. Samples of cement paste and mortar are analysed. A significant difference between cement paste and mortar regarding the neck entrances of ink-bottle type pores is found and attributed to the coarse pore space around the aggregates, the interfacial transition zone.

[1]  S. Brunauer,et al.  PORE STRUCTURES AND SURFACE AREAS OF HARDENED PORTLAND CEMENT PASTES BY NITROGEN ADSORPTION , 1964 .

[2]  E. W. Washburn.  Note on a Method of Determining the Distribution of Pore Sizes in a Porous Material. , 1921, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Kloubek.  Investigation of Porous Structures Using Mercury Reintrusion and Retention , 1994 .

[4]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[5]  Hamlin M. Jennings,et al.  A model for the microstructure of calcium silicate hydrate in cement paste , 2000 .

[6]  N. Seaton.  Determination of the connectivity of porous solids from nitrogen sorption measurements , 1991 .

[7]  E. Barrett,et al.  (CONTRIBUTION FROM THE MULTIPLE FELLOWSHIP OF BAUGH AND SONS COMPANY, MELLOX INSTITUTE) The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms , 1951 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Stephen Brunauer,et al.  Pore structure analysis by water vapor adsorption. IV. Analysis of hydrated portland cement pastes of low porosity , 1972 .

[10]  V. Baroghel-Bouny.  Water Vapour Sorption Experiments on Hardened Cementitious Materials: Part I: Essential Tool for Analysis of Hygral Behaviour and its Relation to Pore Structure , 2007 .

[11]  A.L.A. Fraaij,et al.  Three-dimensional microstructure analysis of numerically simulated cementitious materials , 2003 .

[12]  Maria C.G. Juenger,et al.  The use of nitrogen adsorption to assess the microstructure of cement paste , 2001 .

[13]  Karen L. Scrivener,et al.  Backscattered electron imaging of cementitious microstructures: Understanding and quantification , 2004 .

[14]  Andreas Leemann,et al.  Influence of compaction on the interfacial transition zone and the permeability of concrete , 2006 .

[15]  S. Yariv,et al.  Physical Chemistry of Surfaces , 1979 .

[16]  S. Rigby,et al.  The influence of mercury contact angle, surface tension, and retraction mechanism on the interpretation of mercury porosimetry data. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  N. Wardlaw,et al.  Mercury porosimetry and the interpretation of pore geometry in sedimentary rocks and artificial models , 1981 .

[18]  Constantinos E. Salmas,et al.  Mercury Porosimetry: Contact Angle Hysteresis of Materials with Controlled Pore Structure. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[19]  R. Cranston,et al.  17 The Determination of Pore Structures from Nitrogen Adsorption Isotherms , 1957 .

[20]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[21]  Paul Munroe,et al.  Three-Dimensional Microstructural Characterization Using Focused Ion Beam Tomography , 2007 .

[22]  J. Kaufmann.  Characterization of Pore Space of Cement‐Based Materials by Combined Mercury and Wood's Metal Intrusion , 2009 .

[23]  Jeffrey J. Thomas,et al.  A DISCUSSION OF THE PAPER "THE BET-SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA OF HYDRATED PORTLAND CEMENT AND RELATED MATERIALS" BY IVAN ODLER , 2004 .

[24]  S. Brunauer,et al.  Pore structure analysis without a pore shape model , 1967 .

[25]  I. Odler.  The BET-specific surface area of hydrated Portland cement and related materials , 2003 .

[26]  E. Rideal.  The Physics and Chemistry of Surfaces , 1931, Nature.