Understanding better how emergency doctors work. Analysis of distribution of time and activities of emergency doctors: a systematic review and critical appraisal of time and motion studies

Background Optimising the efficiency and productivity of senior doctors is critical to ED function and delivery of safe patient care. Time and motion studies (TMS) can allow quantification of how these doctors spend their working time, identify inefficiencies in the current work processes and provide insights into improving working conditions, and enhancing productivity. Three questions were addressed: (1) How do senior emergency doctors spend their time in the ED? (2) How much of their time is spent on multitasking? (3) What is the number of tasks completed per hour? Methods The literature was systematically searched for TMS of senior emergency doctors. We searched for articles published in peer-reviewed journals in English language from 1998 to 2018 in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using evidence-based quality criteria relevant for TMS including duration of observation, observer bias, Hawthorne effect and whether the task classification acknowledged any previous existing schemes. A narrative synthesis approach was followed. Results Fourteen TMS were included. The studies were liable to several biases including observer and Hawthorne bias. Overall, the time spent on direct face-to-face contact with the patient accounted for at least around 25%–40% of the senior doctors’ time. The remaining time was mostly spent on indirect clinical care such as communication (8%–44%), documentation (10%–28%) and administrative tasks (2%–20%). The proportion of time spent on multitasking ranged from 10% to 23%. When reported, the number of tasks performed per hour was generally high. Conclusion The review revealed that senior doctors spent a large percentage of their time on direct face-to-face contact with patients. The review findings provided a grounded understanding of how senior doctors spent their time in the ED and could be useful in implementing improvements to the emergency care system.

[1]  Natalie C Benda,et al.  Emergency Physician Task Switching Increases With the Introduction of a Commercial Electronic Health Record. , 2016, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Time-motion analysis of emergency radiologists and emergency physicians at an urban academic medical center , 2013, Emergency Radiology.

[3]  Daly Louise,et al.  Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review , 2013 .

[4]  S. Milton,et al.  One hundred tasks an hour: An observational study of emergency department consultant activities , 2012, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[5]  Anthea Sutton,et al.  Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review , 2012 .

[6]  R. Suter Emergency medicine in the United States: a systemic review , 2012 .

[7]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  How much time do nurses have for patients? a longitudinal study quantifying hospital nurses' patterns of task time distribution and interactions with health professionals , 2011, BMC health services research.

[8]  David A Groneberg,et al.  Doctors' working conditions in emergency care units in Germany: a real-time assessment , 2011, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[9]  C. Duffield,et al.  Nursing staffing, nursing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes. , 2011, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[10]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Using the time and motion method to study clinical work processes and workflow: methodological inconsistencies and a call for standardized research , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  C. Chisholm,et al.  A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  Mark V. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of time studies evaluating physicians in the hospital setting. , 2010, Journal of hospital medicine.

[13]  W. Dunsmuir,et al.  The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  Michael W Carter,et al.  Physician workload and the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: the Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) Study. , 2009, CJEM.

[15]  Dominik Aronsky,et al.  Emergency physicians' behaviors and workload in the presence of an electronic whiteboard , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  G. Innes,et al.  Prospective time study derivation of emergency physician workload predictors. , 2005, CJEM.

[17]  Phillip V. Asaro,et al.  Synchronized Time-Motion Study in the Emergency Department Using a Handheld Computer Application , 2004, MedInfo.

[18]  J. Luitse,et al.  Emergency medicine in the Netherlands. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  W H Cordell,et al.  Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  Linda M. Goldenhar,et al.  Guide to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Work Injuries: How to Show Whether a Safety Intervention Really Works , 2001 .

[21]  Ruth Brown Activities of accident and emergency consultants—a time and motion study , 2000, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[22]  W H Cordell,et al.  How do physicians and nurses spend their time in the emergency department? , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  P A Cameron,et al.  Emergency medicine in Australia. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.