The locus of semantic priming in RSVP target search

At what stage does semantic priming affect accuracy in target search? In two experiments, participants viewed two streams of stimuli, each including a target word among distractors. Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between the targets (T1 and T2) ranged from 53 to 213 msec. A word semantically related to one or neither of the targets preceded each trial. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to report both targets. Although more primed than unprimed targets were reported, there was no cost for unprimed words. A strong interaction between SOA and T1 versus T2 was found, but priming did not interact with either variable. In Experiment 2, only related targets were reported. Performance was similar to that for primed targets in Experiment 1. Semantic priming does not seem to modulate how attentional resources are initially allocated between targets, but instead affects a later stage of processing, the point at which a target word reaches lexical identification.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  D. Lawrence.  Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation* , 1971 .

[3]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[5]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[6]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[8]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[10]  M. Potter,et al.  Word Perception and Misperception in Context , 1993 .

[11]  Steven M. J. Hunt,et al.  MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences , 1994 .

[12]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation , 1994 .

[13]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  V. J. Dark,et al.  Semantic and spatial components of selective attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[16]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[17]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[19]  M C Potter,et al.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  J. Juola,et al.  Priming effects in attentional gating , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[22]  S. Shih.  Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  E Hennighausen,et al.  Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Sander Martens,et al.  Blinks of the mind: memory effects of attentional processes. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Potter,et al.  The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  12 Competition for Attention in Space and Time : The First 200 ms , 2005 .