The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice

In a previous experiment [Kheramin S, Body S, Mobini S, Ho M-Y, Velazquez-Martinez DN, Bradshaw CM, et al. Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis. Psychopharmacology 2002;165: 9-17], destruction of the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC) in rats altered choice between two delayed food reinforcers, enhancing preference for the larger reinforcer. Theoretical analysis based on a quantitative model of inter-temporal choice [Ho M-Y, Mobini S, Chiang T-J, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of 'impulsive choice' behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacology 1999;146:362-72] indicated that the lesion had increased the relative value of the larger of the two reinforcers due to a general reduction of absolute reinforcer value. The present experiment tested this hypothesis using a reinforcement schedule that did not entail either explicit choice or delayed reinforcement. Ten rats received quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the OPFC, and ten rats received sham lesions. The rats were trained under a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement for 60 daily sessions. Response rates in successive ratios were a bitonic (inverted-U) function of ratio size. Analysis of the data using a three-parameter equation derived from a quantitative model of ratio schedule performance [Killeen PR. Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav. Brain Sci. 1994;17:105-72] revealed that the parameter specifying hypothetical reinforcer value was significantly lower in the OPFC-lesioned group than in the sham-lesioned group, consistent with the hypothesis that destruction of the OPFC resulted in devaluation of the food reinforcer.

[1]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Insula of the old world monkey. III: Efferent cortical output and comments on function , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  S. Mobini,et al.  Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of ”impulsive choice” behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[4]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity , 1970, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  P. Killeen.  Mathematical principles of reinforcement , 1994 .

[6]  E. Rolls.  The Brain and Emotion , 2000 .

[7]  M. Reilly.  Extending mathematical principles of reinforcement into the domain of behavioral pharmacology , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[8]  E. Rolls,et al.  Hunger and satiety modify the responses of olfactory and visual neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Rowlett.  A labor-supply analysis of cocaine self-administration under progressive-ratio schedules: antecedents, methodologies, and perspectives , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[10]  W. Schultz,et al.  Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[11]  Geoffrey Schoenbaum,et al.  Different Roles for Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala in a Reinforcer Devaluation Task , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Salamone,et al.  Effects of Dopamine Antagonists and Accumbens Dopamine Depletions on Time-Constrained Progressive-Ratio Performance , 1998, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  J. Monterosso,et al.  Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse control , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[14]  R. Kesner.  Subregional analysis of mnemonic functions of the prefrontal cortex in the rat , 2000, Psychobiology.

[15]  B. Everitt,et al.  Lesions of the Orbitofrontal but not Medial Prefrontal Cortex Disrupt Conditioned Reinforcement in Primates , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  W HODOS,et al.  Progressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength , 1961, Science.

[17]  Geoffrey Schoenbaum,et al.  Orbitofrontal lesions in rats impair reversal but not acquisition of go, no-go odor discriminations , 2002, Neuroreport.

[18]  M. Lesage,et al.  Progressive-ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self-administration: a review , 1998, Psychopharmacology.

[19]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable Forms of Inhibitory Control within Prefrontal Cortex with an Analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: Restriction to Novel Situations and Independence from “On-Line” Processing , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Roberts,et al.  A Critique of Fixed and Progressive Ratio Schedules Used to Examine the Neural Substrates of Drug Reinforcement , 1997, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  A. Phillips,et al.  Withdrawal following repeated exposure to d-amphetamine decreases responding for a sucrose solution as measured by a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[22]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[23]  H. Uylings,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparison of the prefrontal cortex in rat and in primates, including humans. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[24]  E. Rolls,et al.  Gustatory responses of single neurons in the caudolateral orbitofrontal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Wolfgang Hauber,et al.  Orbital prefrontal cortex and guidance of instrumental behaviour in rats under reversal conditions , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  M. Ho,et al.  Effects of 8-OH-DPAT and WAY-100635 on performance on a time-constrained progressive-ratio schedule , 2003, Psychopharmacology.

[27]  J. E. Mazur.  Choice, delay, probability, and conditioned reinforcement , 1997 .

[28]  S Kheramin,et al.  Role of the orbital prefrontal cortex in choice between delayed and uncertain reinforcers: a quantitative analysis , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  W. Hodos,et al.  Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[31]  P R Killeen,et al.  Models of ratio schedule performance. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex and Representation of Incentive Value in Associative Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  P. Killeen,et al.  Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts , 1996, Nature.

[35]  M. Paule,et al.  Progressive ratio performance varies with body weight in rats , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[36]  J. Salamone,et al.  Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Depletions and Time-Constrained Progressive Ratio Performance Effects of Different Ratio Requirements , 1999, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[37]  C. M. Bradshaw,et al.  Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[38]  J. Deakin,et al.  Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[39]  N. Butters,et al.  Behavioral effects of sequential and one-stage ablations of orbital prefrontal cortex in the monkey. , 1973, Experimental neurology.

[40]  N. R. Richardson,et al.  Self-Administration of Psychomotor Stimulants Using Progressive Ratio Schedules of Reinforcement , 1992 .