Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Efforts to Reduce Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania, 2005-2007

Introduction We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a community-based, modified Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) designed to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Methods We developed a Markov decision model to compare costs and effectiveness of a modified DPP intervention with usual care during a 3-year period. Input parameters included costs and outcomes from 2 projects that implemented a community-based modified DPP for participants with metabolic syndrome, and from other sources. The model discounted future costs and benefits by 3% annually. Results At 12 months, usual care reduced relative risk of metabolic syndrome by 12.1%. A modified DPP intervention reduced relative risk by 16.2% and yielded life expectancy gains of 0.01 quality-adjusted life-years (3.67 days) at an incremental cost of $34.50 ($3,420 per quality-adjusted life-year gained). In 1-way sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to probabilities that risk factors would be reduced with or without a modified DPP and that patients would enroll in an intervention, undergo testing, and acquire diabetes with or without an intervention if they were risk-factor–positive. Results were also sensitive to utilities for risk-factor–positive patients. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the intervention cost less than $20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained in approximately 78% of model iterations. Conclusion We consider the modified DPP delivered in community and primary care settings a sound investment.

[1]  D. Marrero,et al.  Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community. The DEPLOY Pilot Study. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  Gretchen A. Piatt,et al.  Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program Into an Urban Medically Underserved Community , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[3]  M. Roberts,et al.  What Does the Value of Modern Medicine Say About the $50,000 per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Decision Rule? , 2008, Medical care.

[4]  A. Nissinen,et al.  Type 2 Diabetes Prevention in the “Real World” , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[5]  J. Lindström,et al.  Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study , 2006, The Lancet.

[6]  Michael J. Pencina,et al.  Trends in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus From the 1970s to the 1990s: The Framingham Heart Study , 2006, Circulation.

[7]  E. Arias,et al.  United States life tables, 2005. , 2010, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[8]  C. Snehalatha,et al.  The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1) , 2006, Diabetologia.

[9]  Deanna J. M. Isaman,et al.  A computer simulation model of diabetes progression, quality of life, and cost. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[10]  David M Eddy,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies for Managing People at High Risk for Diabetes , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  S. Fowler,et al.  The Effect of Metformin and Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on the Metabolic Syndrome: The Diabetes Prevention Program Randomized Trial , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Stephen W. Sorensen,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifestyle Modification or Metformin in Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in Adults with Impaired Glucose Tolerance , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Costs associated with the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the diabetes prevention program. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[14]  Jukka T Salonen,et al.  The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. , 2002, JAMA.

[15]  M. Engelgau,et al.  Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[16]  R. Stevens,et al.  UKPDS 60: Risk of Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes Estimated by the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine , 2002, Stroke.

[17]  S. Fowler,et al.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. , 2002 .

[18]  The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[19]  A. T. N. Group,et al.  Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity: The WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes. , 2001, Diabetologia.

[20]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[21]  Melvin Prince,et al.  The Diabetes Prevention Program. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[22]  D. Fryback,et al.  Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values. , 1998, Medical care.

[23]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[24]  B. Howard,et al.  Effects of Diet and Exercise in Preventing NIDDM in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance: The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[25]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[26]  R. Klein,et al.  Cause-specific mortality in a population-based study of diabetes. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[27]  Dang Qing,et al.  Effects of Diet and Exercise in Preventing NIDDM in People With Impaired Glucose Tolerance The , 2022 .