Thrust geometries and deep structure of the outer and lesser Himalaya, Kumaon and Garhwal (India): Implications for evolution of the Himalayan fold‐and‐thrust belt

The Kumaon-Garhwal region of the Himalaya lies near the center of the Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt. We have drawn two balanced cross sections, 100 km apart, through the Outer and Lesser Himalaya. The cross sections incorporate all the surface, well log, and earthquake seismic data currently available from the region. Two branch line maps showing trailing and leading branch lines and cutoff lines of the major thrusts in the region are also drawn. The three dimensional deep structure of the Outer and Lesser Himalaya is interpreted based on the balanced cross sections and the branch line maps. Deep structure of the Higher and Tethyan Himalaya is extrapolated based on surface geology and is subject to revision as more surface and seismic data become available from these areas. A sequential evolutionary model for the Kumaon Himalaya along the eastern (Pindari) section is proposed. According to this model, the Kumaon Himalaya evolved by an overall forelandward progression of thrusting, with some reactivation along the Munsiari thrust (MT), the Main Boundary thrust (MBT), and the Main Central thrust (MCT). We use structural, stratigraphic, and radiometric criteria to place time constraints on the motion of these thrusts. Earliest motion along the MBT may have occurred in Early-Middle Paleocene, but the main episode probably started in Late Eocene and may still be continuing. Emplacement of the MT had occurred by Middle-Late Eocene, whereas the MCT shows activity around 20 Ma, thus exhibiting break back thrusting with respect to the MT. Shortening estimates are obtained from the Pindari section. Minimum shortening in the sedimentary thrust sheets of the Outer and Lesser Himalaya is 161 km or 65%. As a first approximation, we have also restored the crystalline sheets in order to obtain shortening estimates for the entire Himalaya. Minimum shortening for the Himalaya after restoring the MCT sheet varies from 354 (76%) to 421 km (79%). These estimates were further combined with published data from the area between the MCT sheet and the Indus-Tsangpo Suture Zone (ITSZ). Minimum shortening between the Indo-Ganga foreland and the ITSZ thus obtained lies in the range 687–754 km or 69–72%. We compare our shortening estimates with those available from the Pakistan and Nepal Himalaya.

[1]  J. Dewey,et al.  Tectonic evolution of the India/Eurasia collision zone , 1989 .

[2]  R. J. Lillie,et al.  Development of the Himalayan frontal thrust zone: Salt Range, Pakistan , 1988 .

[3]  J. Achache,et al.  India–Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shortening and driving mechanism of plates , 1984, Nature.

[4]  K. Valdiya Tectonics and evolution of the central sector of the Himalaya , 1988, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  D. Cooper,et al.  The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya , 1987 .

[6]  H. Maluski,et al.  Ages of Alpine tectonometamorphic events in the northwestern Himalaya (northern Pakistan) by 39Ar/40Ar method , 1984 .

[7]  I. Singh Some thougths on the evolution of Himalaya and the Northern limit of the Indian Shield , 1979 .

[8]  C. D. A. Dahlstrom Structural geology in the eastern margin of the canadian rocky mountains , 1970 .

[9]  R. J. Lillie,et al.  Balanced and retrodeformed geological cross-section from the frontal Sulaiman Lobe, Pakistan: Duplex development in thick strata along the western margin of the Indian Plate , 1992 .

[10]  P. Molnar,et al.  Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision: Features of recent continental tectonics in Asia can be interpreted as results of the India-Eurasia collision. , 1975, Science.

[11]  J. Sclater,et al.  A model for the evolution of the Indian Ocean and the breakup of Gondwanaland , 1979 .

[12]  K. Hodges,et al.  Thermal evolution of the Greater Himalaya, Garhwal, India , 1988 .

[13]  B. Burchfiel,et al.  The South Tibetan Detachment System, Himalayan Orogen: Extension Contemporaneous With and Parallel to Shortening in a Collisional Mountain Belt , 1992 .

[14]  Michael R Johnson,et al.  Precollision and postcollision thermal events in the Himalaya , 1990 .

[15]  G. Ferrara,et al.  Rb/Sr geochronology of granites and gneisses from the Mount Everest region, Nepal Himalaya , 1983 .

[16]  J. Hossack A cross-section through the Scandinavian Caledonides constructed with the aid of branch-line maps , 1983 .

[17]  P. Vidal Rb-Sr systematics in granite from central Nepal (Manaslu): Significance of the Oligocene age and high 87Sr/86Sr ratio in Himalayan orogeny: Comment and reply , 1978 .

[18]  C. Deniel,et al.  Isotopic study of the Manaslu granite (Himalaya, Nepal): inferences on the age and source of Himalayan leucogranites , 1987 .

[19]  B. Lombardo,et al.  Metamorphic evolution of the High Himalayan Crystallines in SE Zanskar, India , 1989 .

[20]  K. Valdiya,et al.  Geomorphologic Development Across the Active Main Boundary Thrust, An Example from the Nainital Hills in Kumaun Himalaya , 1984 .

[21]  M. Hubbard Thermobarometric constraints on the thermal history of the Main Central Thrust Zone and Tibetan Slab, eastern Nepal Himalaya , 1989 .

[22]  A. Rao On the Krol Nappe Hypothesis , 1968 .

[23]  D. McKenzie,et al.  The Evolution of the Indian Ocean since the Late Cretaceous , 1971 .

[24]  James Ni,et al.  Seismotectonics of the Himalayan Collision Zone: Geometry of the underthrusting Indian Plate beneath the Himalaya , 1984 .

[25]  A. Cocherie,et al.  Geochemical investigations of the origin of the Manaslu leucogranite (Himalaya, Nepal) , 1982 .

[26]  Peter Molnar,et al.  Constraints on the structure of the Himalaya from an analysis of gravity anomalies and a flexural model of the lithosphere , 1983 .

[27]  J. Rupke Stratigraphic and structural evolution of the Kumaon Lesser Himalaya , 1974 .

[28]  J. Hamet,et al.  Rb-Sr systematics in granite from central Nepal (Manaslu): Significance of the Oligocene age and high 87Sr/86Sr ratio in Himalayan orogeny: Comment and reply: REPLY , 1978 .

[29]  L. Snee,et al.  Evidence for late Precambrian to early Cambrian orogeny in northwest Himalaya, Pakistan , 1988, Geological Magazine.

[30]  R. A. Price,et al.  The Cordilleran foreland thrust and fold belt in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains , 1981, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[31]  M. Searle,et al.  Comment and Reply on "Precollision and postcollision thermal events in the Himalaya" , 1991 .

[32]  A. Hussain,et al.  Fold and thrust propagation in the western Himalaya based on a balanced cross section of the Surghar Range and Kohat Plateau, Pakistan , 1991 .

[33]  K. Valdiya An Outline of the Structural Set-Up of the Kumaun Himalaya , 1979 .

[34]  P. Molnar,et al.  Focal depths and fault plane solutions of earthquakes and active tectonics of the Himalaya , 1984 .

[35]  L. Seeber,et al.  Some elements of continental subduction along the Himalayan front , 1984 .

[36]  K. Valdiya,et al.  Rb-Sr Ages of Granitic Rocks Within the Lesser Himalayan Nappes, Kumaun, India , 1984 .

[37]  D. Cooper,et al.  Collision tectonics of the Ladakh-Zanskar Himalaya , 1988, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[38]  D. Burbank The chronology of intermontane-basin development in the northwestern Himalaya and the evolution of the Northwest Syntaxis , 1983 .

[39]  P. Fort Manaslu leucogranite: A collision signature of the Himalaya: A model for its genesis and emplacement , 1981 .

[40]  E. Herren Zanskar shear zone: Northeast-southwest extension within the Higher Himalayas (Ladakh, India) , 1987 .

[41]  J. Cater,et al.  The structure and stratigraphy of SE Zanskar, Ladakh Himalaya , 1990, Journal of the Geological Society.

[42]  J. Burg,et al.  Deformation of leucogranites of the crystalline Main Central Sheet in southern Tibet (China) , 1984 .

[43]  C. D. A. Dahlstrom Balanced cross sections , 1969 .

[44]  A. Pêcher The metamorphism in the Central Himalaya , 1989 .

[45]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[46]  B. Burchfiel,et al.  North-south extension within the convergent Himalayan region , 1985 .

[47]  A. Bally,et al.  Structure, seismic data and orogenic evolution of southern Canadian Rocky Mountains , 1970 .

[48]  P. Saklani,et al.  Tectonics of the Main Central Thrust in Garhwal Himalaya, U.P. , 1988 .

[49]  M. Schidlowski,et al.  Chronostratigraphic markers in the end-Precambrian carbon isotope record of the Lesser Himalaya , 1987, Nature.

[50]  D. Schelling,et al.  Thrust tectonics, crustal shortening, and the structure of the far-eastern Nepal Himalaya , 1991 .

[51]  K. Valdiya Stromatolites of the Lesser Himalayan Carbonate Formations and the Vindhyans , 1969 .

[52]  M. R. Johnson,et al.  Structural evolution in the northern part of the Moine thrust belt, NW Scotland , 1980, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences.

[53]  A. K. Sinha Geology of the Higher Central Himalaya , 1989 .

[54]  K. Hodges,et al.  Possible thermal buffering by crustal anatexis in collisional orogens: Thermobarometric evidence from the Nepalese Himalaya , 1988 .

[55]  F. Diegel Topological constraints on imbricate thrust networks, examples from the Mountain City window, Tennessee, U.S.A. , 1986 .