How groups develop a specialized domain vocabulary: A cognitive multi-agent model

We simulate the evolution of a domain vocabulary in small communities. Empirical data show that human communicators can evolve graphical languages quickly in a constrained task (Pictionary), and that communities converge towards a common language. We propose that simulations of such cultural evolution incorporate properties of human memory (cue-based retrieval, learning, decay). A cognitive model is described that encodes abstract concepts with small sets of concrete, related concepts (directing), and that also decodes such signs (matching). Learning captures conventionalized signs. Relatedness of concepts is characterized by a mixture of shared and individual knowledge, which we sample from a text corpus. Simulations show vocabulary convergence of agent communities of varied structure, but idiosyncrasy in vocabularies of each dyad of models. Convergence is weakened when agents do not alternate between encoding and decoding, predicting the necessity of bi-directional communication. Convergence is improved by explicit feedback about communicative success. We hypothesize that humans seek out subtle clues to gauge success in order to guide their vocabulary acquisition.

[1]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[2]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Stocco,et al.  Syntactic comprehension in agrammatism: A computational model , 2005, Brain and Language.

[4]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  David Reitter,et al.  Context effects in language production : models of syntactic priming in dialogue corpora , 2008 .

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[8]  Jerry Ball,et al.  Toward a Large-Scale Model of Language Comprehension in ACT-R 6 , 2007 .

[9]  van Hedderik Rijn,et al.  Proceedings of the eight International Conference on Cognitive Modeling , 2007 .

[10]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Word Frequency Distributions , 2001 .

[11]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Language as an evolutionary system , 2005 .

[12]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[13]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[14]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[15]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[16]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[17]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  David Reitter Accountable Modeling in ACT-UP , a Scalable , Rapid-Prototyping ACT-R Implementation , 2010 .

[19]  Michael Oliphant,et al.  Learning and the Emergence of Coordinated Communication , 1997 .

[20]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[22]  R. Jackendoff Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[23]  Robert L. Goldstone Returning to a New Home , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Comprehending anaphoric metaphors , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[25]  S. Kirby,et al.  The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model , 2002 .

[26]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Complex Systems in Language Evolution: the Cultural Emergence of Compositional Structure , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[27]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Language Evolution by Iterated Learning With Bayesian Agents , 2007, Cogn. Sci..