Phantom vibrations among undergraduates: Prevalence and associated psychological characteristics

'Phantom vibration syndrome,' or perceived vibrations from a device that is not really vibrating, is a recent psychological phenomenon that has attracted the attention of the media and medical community. Most (89%) of the 290 undergraduates in our sample had experienced phantom vibrations, and they experienced them about once every two weeks, on average. However, few found them bothersome. Those higher in conscientiousness experienced phantom vibrations less frequently, and those who had strong reactions to text messages (higher in the emotional reaction subscale of text message dependence) were more bothered by phantom vibrations. These findings suggest that targeting individuals' emotional reactions to text messages might be helpful in combating the negative consequences of both text message dependency and phantom vibrations. However, because few young adults were bothered by these phantom vibrations or made attempts to stop them, interventions aimed at this population may be unnecessary.

[1]  Michael B Rothberg,et al.  Phantom vibration syndrome among medical staff: a cross sectional survey , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[4]  F. Cao,et al.  Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: prevalence and psychological features. , 2007, Child: Care, Health and Development.

[5]  Xi Lu,et al.  Internet and mobile phone text-messaging dependency: Factor structure and correlation with dysphoric mood among Japanese adults , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  David J. Laramie.  Emotional and behavioral aspects of mobile phone use , 2007 .

[7]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  P. Costa,et al.  Four ways five factors are basic , 1992 .

[9]  Tamera R. Schneider,et al.  The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. , 2004 .

[10]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Young Adults' Use of Social Networking Sites , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  H. Eysenck.  Dimensions of personality : 16, 5 or 3? ― Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm , 1991 .

[13]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Gaming Addiction : The Role of Sensation Seeking , Self-Control , Neuroticism , Aggression , State Anxiety , and Trait Anxiety , 2010 .

[14]  Tasuku Igarashi,et al.  No mobile, no life: Self-perception and text-message dependency among Japanese high school students , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach , 1985 .

[16]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[17]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  ‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape , 2004 .

[18]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[19]  Katrien Van Cleemput,et al.  “I’ll See You on IM, Text, or Call You”: A Social Network Approach of Adolescents’ Use of Communication Media , 2010 .

[20]  R. Larsen,et al.  EXTRAVERSION, NEUROTICISM AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE MOOD INDUCTION PROCEDURES , 1989 .