Does Instructor Type Matter? Undergraduate Student Perception of Graduate Teaching Assistants and Professors

Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are used extensively as instructors in higher education, yet their status and authority as teachers may be unclear to undergraduates, to administrators, and even to the GTAs themselves. This study explored undergraduate perception of classroom instruction by GTAs and professors to identify factors unique to each type of instructor versus the type of classes they teach. Data collection was via an online survey composed of subscales from two validated instruments, as well as one open-ended question asking students to compare the same class taught by a professor versus a GTA. Quantitative and qualitative results indicated that some student instructional perceptions are specific to instructor type, and not class type. For example, regardless of type of class, professors are perceived as being confident, in control, organized, experienced, knowledgeable, distant, formal, strict, hard, boring, and respected. Conversely, GTAs are perceived as uncertain, hesitant, nervous, relaxed, laid-back, engaging, interactive, relatable, understanding, and able to personalize teaching. Overall, undergraduates seem to perceive professors as having more knowledge and authority over the curriculum, but enjoy the instructional style of GTAs. The results of this study will be used to make recommendations for GTA professional development programs.

[1]  Matthew R. Wawrzynski,et al.  Contingent Faculty as Teachers , 2011 .

[2]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  On the Road to Becoming A Professor: The Graduate Student Experience , 1999 .

[3]  Iryna Johnson,et al.  Contingent Instructors and Student Outcomes: An Artifact or a Fact? , 2011 .

[4]  John W. Rushin,et al.  Graduate Teaching Assistant Training: A Basis for Improvement of College Biology Teaching & Faculty Development? , 1997 .

[5]  K. Roach.  Effects of graduate teaching assistant attire on student learning, misbehaviors, and ratings of instruction , 1997 .

[6]  Gillian H. Roehrig,et al.  Growing a Garden without Water: Graduate Teaching Assistants in Introductory Science Laboratories at a Doctoral/Research University , 2004 .

[7]  Chris M. Golde.  Beginning Graduate School: Explaining First‐Year Doctoral Attrition , 1998 .

[8]  Chris J. Park,et al.  The donkey in the department? Insights into the Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) experience in the UK. , 2002 .

[9]  E. Benjamin.  How Over-Reliance on Contingent Appointments Diminishes Faculty Involvement in Student Learning | Association of American Colleges & Universities , 2002 .

[10]  D. Treagust,et al.  Validation and Application of the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI). , 1986 .

[11]  Valbona Muzaka,et al.  The niche of Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs): perceptions and reflections , 2009 .

[12]  Michael G. Dudley.  Jumping out of an Airplane: A TA's Perspective on Teaching Effectiveness , 2009 .

[13]  Leo M. Lambert,et al.  Anticipatory socialization of undergraduate college teaching norms by entering graduate teaching assistants , 1995 .

[14]  Michele Marincovich,et al.  The Professional Development of Graduate Teaching Assistants. , 1998 .

[15]  Chris J. Park.  Neither fish now fowl: the perceived benefits and problems of using Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to teach undergraduate students. , 2002 .

[16]  E. William Wischusen,et al.  A REAPPRAISAL OF THE STATUS OF Introductory Biology Laboratory Education in U.S. Colleges & Universities , 2005 .

[17]  Paul D. Umbach.  How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education , 2006 .

[18]  Audrey J. Jaeger.  Contingent Faculty and Student Outcomes. , 2008 .

[19]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Evaluating educational environments. , 1980 .

[20]  P-16: Building a Cohesive Education System from Preschool through Postsecondary. , 2003 .

[21]  J. Lowman,et al.  What Should Graduate Teaching Assistants Know about Teaching? , 1993 .

[22]  Ann E. Austin.  Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career , 2002 .

[23]  David M. Shannon,et al.  TA Teaching Effectiveness: The Impact of Training and Teaching Experience , 1998 .

[24]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  An Application of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction and College and University Classroom Environment Inventory in a Multicultural Tertiary Context , 2002 .

[25]  Mary C. Wright,et al.  The Impact of Teaching Assistants on Student Retention in the Sciences: Lessons for TA Training , 2007 .

[26]  Ronald R. Bos,et al.  Teaching Assistant Traits: Their Influence on Student Ratings , 1980 .

[27]  Robert D. Bolge.  Examination of Student Learning as a Function of Instructor Status (Full-Time versus Part-Time) at Mercer County Community College. , 1995 .

[28]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[29]  Paul D. Umbach,et al.  Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement , 2005 .

[30]  B. Flora.  Graduate Assistants: Students or staff, policy or practice? The Current Legal Employment Status of Graduate Assistants , 2007 .

[31]  Janet Bond-Robinson,et al.  Catalyzing Graduate Teaching Assistants' Laboratory Teaching through Design Research. , 2006 .

[32]  Lynne E. Anderson,et al.  Factors That Make Faculty and Student Relationships Effective , 2002 .

[33]  L. Darby.  Science Students' Perceptions of Engaging Pedagogy , 2003 .