On the Preliminary Structural Design Strategy of the Wing of the Next-Generation Civil Tiltrotor Technology Demonstrator

The T-WING project is a Clean Sky 2 research project aimed at designing, manufacturing, qualifying and flight-testing the new wing of the Next-Generation Civil Tiltrotor Technology Demonstrator (NGCTR-TD), as part of the Fast Rotorcraft Innovative Aircraft Demonstrator Platforms (FRC IADP) activities. Requirements, design strategy, methodology and main steps followed to achieve the composite wing preliminary design are presented. The main driving requirements have been expressed in terms of dynamic requirements (e.g., limitations on natural frequencies), aeroelastic requirements, i.e., compliance with European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) CS-25 and CS-29 Airworthiness Requirements), structural requirements (e.g., target wing structural mass), functional requirements (e.g., fuel tanks, accessibility, assembly and integration, etc.) and wing preliminary loads. Based on the above-mentioned requirements, the first design loop is performed by targeting an optimal wing structure able to withstand preliminary design loads, and simultaneously with stiffness and inertia distributions leading to a configuration free from flutter within the flight envelope. The outcome from the first design loop is then used to refine the model and compute more reliable flight loads and repeat aeroelastic analysis, returning further requirements to be fulfilled in terms of wing stiffness and inertia distributions. The process is iterated till the fulfillment of all the project requirements.

[1]  Theodore Nicolas Dracopoulos Aeroelastic control of composite lifting surfaces : integrated aeroelastic control optimization / , 1988 .

[2]  Ken-Ichi Nasu Tilt-rotor flutter control in cruise flight , 1986 .

[3]  Mark W. Nixon Book Review: Rotary Wing Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, 2nd Edition by Richard L. Bielawa , 2006 .

[4]  Taeseong Kim,et al.  Structural design optimization of a tiltrotor aircraft composite wing to enhance whirl flutter stability , 2013 .

[5]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[6]  Mark W. Nixon,et al.  Parametric Studies for Tiltrotor Aeroelastic Stability in Highspeed Flight , 1993 .

[7]  Ji . Cecrdle Whirl fluttler of turboprop aircraft structures , 2015 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[9]  Farhan Gandhi,et al.  Design Optimization for Improved Soft In-Plane Tiltrotor Aeroelastic in Airplane Mode , 2010 .

[10]  W. Johnson,et al.  Dynamics of tilting proprotor aircraft in cruise flight , 1974 .

[11]  Jai Moo Kim,et al.  Design optimization framework for tiltrotor composite wings considering whirl flutter stability , 2010 .

[12]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[13]  E. F. Bruhn,et al.  Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures , 1973 .

[14]  Taeseong Kim,et al.  Structural Integrity Design of a Composite Wing in a Tiltrotor Aircraft , 2011 .

[15]  Ian O'Connor,et al.  iMASKO: A Genetic Algorithm Based Optimization Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2013, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.