Leibnizian Intensional Semantics for Syllogistic Reasoning

Venn diagrams are standardly used to give a semantics for Syllogistic reasoning. This interpretation is extensional. Leibniz, however, preferred an intensional interpretation, according to which a singular and universal sentence is true iff the (meaning of) the predicate is contained in the (meaning of) the subject. Although Leibniz’s preferred interpretation played a major role in his philosophy (in Leibniz [16] he justifies his metaphysical ‘Principle of Sufficient Reason’ in terms of it) he was not able to extend his succesfull intensional interpretation (making use of characteristic numbers) without negative terms to one where also negative terms are allowed. The goal of this paper is to show how syllogistic reasoning with complex terms can be given a natural set theoretic ‘intensional’ semantics, where the meaning of a term is not defined in terms of individuals. We will make use of the ideas behind van Fraassen’s [6, 7] hyperintensional semantics to account for this.

[1]  Klaus Glashoff,et al.  AN INTENSIONAL LEIBNIZ SEMANTICS FOR ARISTOTELIAN LOGIC , 2010, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[2]  Joseph T. Clark,et al.  Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. , 1952 .

[3]  O. Bradley Bassler,et al.  Leibniz on Intension, Extension, and the Representation of Syllogistic Inference , 1998, Synthese.

[4]  Van Fraassen,et al.  Facts and Tautological Entailments , 1969 .

[5]  W. Lenzen Das System der Leibnizschen Logik , 1990 .

[6]  Fred Sommers I.—THE CALCULUS OF TERMS , 1970 .

[7]  Robert van Rooij,et al.  The propositional and relational syllogistic , 2012 .

[8]  Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,et al.  Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding , 1996 .

[9]  John M. Martin,et al.  Aristotle'S natural deduction reconsidered , 1997 .

[10]  Otto Bird Syllogistic and Its Extensions. , 1964 .

[11]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  LOGICS FOR THE RELATIONAL SYLLOGISTIC , 2008, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[12]  V. Sotirov,et al.  Arithmetizations of Syllogistic à la Leibniz , 1999, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[13]  Julien Offray de La Mettrie,et al.  Machine Man and Other Writings: Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy , 1996 .

[14]  Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,et al.  A paper on "some logical difficulties" , 1966 .

[15]  H. Joachim,et al.  The Nature Of Truth , 2010 .

[16]  L. Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.

[17]  Jan Łukasiewicz Aristotle's Syllogistic From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic , 1957 .

[18]  G. Leibniz,et al.  New Essays on Human Understanding. , 1981 .

[19]  Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,et al.  Rules from which a decision can be made, by means of numbers, about the validity of inferences and about the forms and moods of categorical syllogisms , 1966 .