A successful implementation of e-epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study ‘Snart-Gravid’

The attraction of being able to use the internet for the recruitment of an epidemiologic cohort stems mainly from cost efficiency and convenience. The pregnancy planning study (‘Snart-Gravid’)—a prospective cohort study of Danish women planning a pregnancy—was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and cost efficiency of using internet-based recruitment and follow-up. Feasibility was assessed by examining patient accrual data over time, questionnaire-specific response rates and losses to follow-up. The relative cost efficiency was examined by comparing the study costs with those of an alternative non internet-based study approach. The target recruitment of 2,500 participants over 6 months was achieved using advertisements on a health-related website, supported by a coordinated media strategy at study initiation. Questionnaire cycle-specific response rates ranged from 87 to 90% over the 12-month follow-up. At 6 months, 87% of women had a known outcome or were still under follow-up; at 12 months the figure was 82%. The study cost of $400,000 ($160 per enrolled subject) compared favorably with the estimated cost to conduct the same study using a conventional non-internet based approach ($322 per subject). The gain in efficiency with the internet-based approach appeared to be even more substantial with longer follow-up and larger study sizes. The successful conduct of this pilot study suggests that the internet may be a useful tool to recruit and follow subjects in prospective cohort studies.

[1]  T. Halldorsson,et al.  Data collected on maternal dietary exposures in the Danish National Birth Cohort. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[2]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  Declining trends in conception rates in recent birth cohorts of native Danish women: a possible role of deteriorating male reproductive health , 2008, International journal of andrology.

[3]  Henrik Toft Sørensen,et al.  Cohort profile: the Danish Web-based Pregnancy Planning Study--'Snart-Gravid'. , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Leslie Lenert,et al.  The internet as a research tool: Worth the price of admission? , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[5]  Use of World Wide Web-based directories for tracing subjects in epidemiologic studies. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Jan-Eric Litton,et al.  New times, new needs; e-epidemiology , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[7]  L. Garfinkel,et al.  Smoking habits and tar levels in a new American Cancer Society prospective study of 1.2 million men and women. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Smoking and death rates—report on forty‐four months of follow‐up of 187,783 men , 1988 .

[9]  L. Garfinkel Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the American Cancer Society prospective studies. , 1985, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[10]  F. Linder,et al.  National Health Survey; established in 1956, it is measuring levels, trends, and social consequences of various illnesses. , 1958, Science.

[11]  D D Baird,et al.  Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  J. Olsen,et al.  Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. The European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[13]  DAVID W. KALISCH,et al.  The National Health Survey , 1957, Social Service Review.

[14]  T. McAlindon,et al.  Conducting clinical trials over the internet: feasibility study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods. , 1998, Reproductive toxicology.

[16]  A. Bostom,et al.  Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  L Frank,et al.  When an Entire Country Is a Cohort , 2000, Science.

[18]  T. Perneger,et al.  A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  J. Manson,et al.  Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  C. Johansen,et al.  Risk perception among women receiving genetic counseling: a population-based follow-up study. , 2007, Cancer detection and prevention.

[21]  P. Hartge Participation in population studies. , 2006, Epidemiology.

[22]  T. McAlindon,et al.  Can Clinical Trials Requiring Frequent Participant Contact Be Conducted Over the Internet? Results From an Online Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Topical Ointment for Herpes Labialis , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Henrik Toft Sørensen,et al.  The Danish National Birth Cohort - its background, structure and aim , 2001, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[24]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Landmark article March 15, 1958: Smoking and death rates--report on forty-four months of follow-up of 187,783 men. By E. Cuyler Hammond and Daniel Horn. , 1984, JAMA.

[25]  M. Frydenberg,et al.  Does Low Participation in Cohort Studies Induce Bias? , 2006, Epidemiology.

[26]  J. Olsen,et al.  Recall Bias in a Case-Control Surveillance System on the Use of Medicine during Pregnancy , 2001, Epidemiology.

[27]  J. Palmer,et al.  Follow-up of a large cohort of Black women. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.