Identification of modal parameters from transmissibility measurements

Abstract It is a well-known fact that linear dynamic behavior of structures can be studied by modeling the relation between force(s) [input(s)], acting on a structure, and their resulting structural vibration response(s) [output(s)]. For industrial structures, in their real in-operation conditions, it often becomes hard (or impossible) to experimentally measure the excitation. For this reason system identification techniques have been developed that work on a basis of response data only. However, current output only techniques have serious limitations when applied to some practical cases. One limiting constraint of the current OMA techniques is that the non-measured excitations to the system in operation must be white-noise sequences. In practice however, structural vibrations observed in operation cannot always be considered as pure white-noise excitation. Current techniques may encounter difficulties to correctly identify the modal parameters. In this paper a new OMA approach to identify modal parameters from output-only transmissibility measurements is introduced. This method does not make any assumption about the nature of the excitations to the system. In general, the poles that are identified from transmissibility measurements do not correspond with the system's poles. However, by combining transmissibility measurements under different loading conditions, it is shown in this paper that modal parameters can be identified. In this contribution a numerical experiment on a cantilever beam was conducted. A comparison was made between the results of a classic input–output and the new output-only modal analysis based on transmissibility measurements.

[1]  Prasenjit Mohanty,et al.  Operational modal analysis in the presence of harmonic excitation , 2004 .

[2]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  Modified ERA method for operational modal analysis in the presence of harmonic excitations , 2006 .

[3]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[4]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  A modified Ibrahim time domain algorithm for operational modal analysis including harmonic excitation , 2004 .

[5]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[6]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[7]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[8]  L. Hermans,et al.  MODAL TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES UNDER OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS: INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS , 1999 .

[9]  Bart Peeters,et al.  System identification and damage detection in civil engineering , 2000 .

[10]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Using Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition as a Robust Technique to Harmonic Excitation in Operational Modal Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  E. Parloo,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of non-stationary operational data , 2003 .

[12]  P. Guillaume,et al.  The PolyMAX Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation? , 2004 .

[13]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of modal parameters from operational data , 1999 .

[14]  E. Parloo,et al.  Force identification by means of in-operation modal models , 2002 .

[15]  H. Van der Auweraer,et al.  A frequency-domain maximum likelihood approach for the extraction of modal parameters from output-only data , 1998 .

[16]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Parametric identification of transfer functions in the frequency domain-a survey , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .