Normalizing computed tomography data reconstructed with different filter kernels: effect on emphysema quantification

[1]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of emphysema and airway measurements according to iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction , 2014, European Radiology.

[2]  F. Martinez,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[3]  Joyce D. Schroeder,et al.  Automated texture-based quantification of centrilobular nodularity and centrilobular emphysema in chest CT images. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[4]  P F Judy,et al.  Reference standard and statistical model for intersite and temporal comparisons of CT attenuation in a multicenter quantitative lung study. , 2012, Medical physics.

[5]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography in COPD: Possibilities and Limitations , 2011, Lung.

[6]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Equating quantitative emphysema measurements on different CT image reconstructions. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  E. Regan,et al.  Clinical and radiographic predictors of GOLD-unclassified smokers in the COPDGene study. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  Toru Matsumoto,et al.  Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening. , 2011, Medical physics.

[9]  B. Stoel,et al.  Lung densitometry to assess progression of emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: time to apply in the clinic? , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  E. Regan,et al.  Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) Study Design , 2011, COPD.

[11]  Jason C Woods,et al.  Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[12]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Automatic lung segmentation from thoracic computed tomography scans using a hybrid approach with error detection. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: size distribution of emphysematous spaces on multidetector CT images--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  State of the Art. A structural and functional assessment of the lung via multidetector-row computed tomography: phenotyping chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2006, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[15]  M. Mascalchi,et al.  Spirometrically gated high-resolution CT findings in COPD: lung attenuation vs lung function and dyspnea severity. , 2006, Chest.

[16]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures. , 2004, Radiology.

[17]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  T Aach,et al.  Digital radiography enhancement by nonlinear multiscale processing. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  A A Bankier,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  KATSUMI ABE,et al.  A Fully Automated Adaptive Unsharp Masking Technique in Digital Chest Radiograph , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[21]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[23]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[24]  G. Smirnov,et al.  Possibilities and Limitations , 1970 .

[25]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.