Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system

A widespread system used by bacteria for protection against potentially dangerous foreign DNA molecules consists of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) coupled with cas (CRISPR-associated) genes. Similar to RNA interference in eukaryotes, these CRISPR/Cas systems use small RNAs for sequence-specific detection and neutralization of invading genomes. Here we describe the first examples of genes that mediate the inhibition of a CRISPR/Cas system. Five distinct ‘anti-CRISPR’ genes were found in the genomes of bacteriophages infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mutation of the anti-CRISPR gene of a phage rendered it unable to infect bacteria with a functional CRISPR/Cas system, and the addition of the same gene to the genome of a CRISPR/Cas-targeted phage allowed it to evade the CRISPR/Cas system. Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR genes may represent a widespread mechanism for phages to overcome the highly prevalent CRISPR/Cas systems. The existence of anti-CRISPR genes presents new avenues for the elucidation of CRISPR/Cas functional mechanisms and provides new insight into the co-evolution of phages and bacteria.

[1]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  F. Rohwer,et al.  Explaining microbial population genomics through phage predation , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[3]  G. O’Toole,et al.  Prevalence, conservation and functional analysis of Yersinia and Escherichia CRISPR regions in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates , 2011, Microbiology.

[4]  G. Lau,et al.  Genome sequence comparison and superinfection between two related Pseudomonas aeruginosa phages, D3112 and MP22. , 2007, Microbiology.

[5]  U. Qimron,et al.  Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[7]  H. Schweizer,et al.  PBAD-Based Shuttle Vectors for Functional Analysis of Toxic and Highly Regulated Genes in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia spp. and Other Bacteria , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Erik J. Sontheimer,et al.  Self vs. non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[10]  You-Hee Cho,et al.  Complete Genome Sequences of Two Pseudomonas aeruginosa Temperate Phages, MP29 and MP42, Which Lack the Phage-Host CRISPR Interaction , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[11]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[12]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[13]  George A. O'Toole,et al.  Non-Identity-Mediated CRISPR-Bacteriophage Interaction Mediated via the Csy and Cas3 Proteins , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA , 2010, Nature.

[15]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[17]  D. Guttman,et al.  Complete Sequence and Evolutionary Genomic Analysis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Transposable Bacteriophage D3112 , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system , 2012, Nature Communications.

[19]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system , 2011, Nature.

[20]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Sylvain Moineau,et al.  Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[22]  G. O’Toole,et al.  Interaction between Bacteriophage DMS3 and Host CRISPR Region Inhibits Group Behaviors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  C. Kitts,et al.  Complete Genomic Sequence of Bacteriophage B3, a Mu-Like Phage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  RNA-guided complex from a bacterial immune system enhances target recognition through seed sequence interactions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Sequence- and Structure-Specific RNA Processing by a CRISPR Endonuclease , 2010, Science.

[26]  J. Vogel,et al.  CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III , 2011, Nature.

[27]  George A. O'Toole,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas Adaptive Immune System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mediates Resistance to Naturally Occurring and Engineered Phages , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  N. Grishin,et al.  A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action , 2006, Biology Direct.

[29]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  RNA in defense: CRISPRs protect prokaryotes against mobile genetic elements. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[30]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[31]  J. Rello,et al.  Hybrid Pathogenicity Island PAGI-5 Contributes to the Highly Virulent Phenotype of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolate in Mammals , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  S. Casjens,et al.  Bacteriophage Mu genome sequence: analysis and comparison with Mu-like prophages in Haemophilus, Neisseria and Deinococcus. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.