Chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses

Purpose To evaluate the impact of target distance on polychromatic image quality in a virtual model eye implanted with hybrid refractive–diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs). Setting School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. Design Experimental study. Methods A pseudophakic model eye was constructed by incorporating a phase‐delay map for a diffractive optical element into a reduced eye model incorporating ocular chromatic aberration, pupil apodization, and higher‐order monochromatic aberrations. The diffractive element was a monofocal IOL with a +3.2 diopter (D) diffractive power or 2 types of bifocal IOLs (nonapodized or apodized) with a +2.92 D addition (add) power. Polychromatic point‐spread functions and image quality for white and monochromatic light were quantified for a series of target vergences, wavelengths, and pupil diameters using modulation transfer functions and image‐quality metrics. Results Ocular longitudinal chromatic aberration was largely corrected by the monofocal design and by both bifocal designs for near targets. In the bifocal design, add power and the ratio of distance:near image quality changed significantly with wavelength and pupil size. Also, image quality for distance was better with the apodized design. Conclusions Achromatization by the diffractive IOL provided significant improvement in polychromatic retinal image quality. Along with apodization and higher‐order aberrations, it can significantly affect the near–distance balance provided by a diffractive multifocal IOL. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  Sowmya Ravikumar,et al.  Calculation of retinal image quality for polychromatic light. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  G. M. Morris,et al.  Spectral properties of multiorder diffractive lenses. , 1995, Applied optics.

[3]  T. Olsen,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  J. Davison,et al.  History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  Henk Weeber,et al.  Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[8]  P Artal,et al.  Modulation transfer functions of eyes implanted with intraocular lenses. , 1993, Applied optics.

[9]  M. Schmid Principles Of Optics Electromagnetic Theory Of Propagation Interference And Diffraction Of Light , 2016 .

[10]  S. Sacu,et al.  Anterior chamber depth and change in axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  S. Klein Understanding the diffractive bifocal contact lens. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  Chromatic Aberration and Optical Power of a Diffractive Bifocal Contact Lens , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  Li Wang,et al.  Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  Jerzy Nowak,et al.  Retinal images in a model of a pseudophakic eye with classic and hybrid intraocular lenses , 2008 .

[15]  R. Lindstrom,et al.  Multifocal intraocular lenses , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[17]  P. Piers,et al.  Theoretical performance of intraocular lenses correcting both spherical and chromatic aberration. , 2012, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  G E Legge,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  M. Mainster,et al.  The effect of chromatic dispersion on pseudophakic optical performance , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  New intraocular lens for achromatizing the human eye , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  A. Bradley,et al.  Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[22]  Yan Wang,et al.  Achromatic customized intraocular lens based on an individual pseudophakic eye model , 2010 .

[23]  J. Rogers,et al.  Optical performance of holographic kinoforms. , 1989, Applied optics.

[24]  Max Born,et al.  Principles of optics - electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (7. ed.) , 1999 .

[25]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal aberrations before and after small-incision cataract surgery. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Sverker Norrby,et al.  Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  Karla Zadnik,et al.  Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  O. W. Richards Effects of Luminance and Contrast on Visual Acuity, Ages 16 to 90 Years , 1977, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.