Advancing CO2 Storage Monitoring via Cross-Borehole Apparent Resistivity Imaging Simulation

Conventional resistivity inversion methodologies encounter constraints in perpetual monitoring owing to the necessity for recurrent measurements. In response, this research leverages a 3-D finite element method to formulate an approximate geometry imaging of cross-borehole resistivity during forward modeling, circumventing the direct computation of Jacobian matrix equations in the electric field. This study meticulously explores the complex relationship among apparent resistivity (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), carbon dioxide (CO2) resistivity (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{\text {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), and the volume of the CO2 storage area (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$V_{\mathrm {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). Remarkably, the impact of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{\mathrm {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is found to be more pronounced than that of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$V_{\text {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, attributed to the repulsion effect emanating from the high-resistance storage area. A robust linear correlation between <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$V_{\text {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is identified across various multihorizontal layer models, while the relationship between <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{\mathrm {CO2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> adheres to a rational function. The intricate correlation between <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rho _{a}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and CO2 concentration is dissected, offering a quantitative perspective for inferring the resistivity of the CO2 storage area. These findings are further validated through field formation models featuring salt caverns, highlighting the effectiveness of cross-borehole resistivity imaging for CO2 storage monitoring. Beyond enhancing our understanding of subsurface geological behavior, our study underscores the feasibility of using salt caverns for CO2 storage, presenting a pioneering approach towards navigating the monitoring of subsurface CO2 storage.

[1]  M. E. Ferreira,et al.  Satellite, UAV, and Geophysical Data to Identify Surface and Subsurface Hydrodynamics of Geographically Isolated Wetlands: Understanding an Undervalued Ecosystem at the Atlantic Forest-Cerrado Interface of Brazil , 2023, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Pingfeng Wang,et al.  Large-scale storage of hydrogen in salt caverns for carbon footprint reduction , 2023, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[3]  A. Verma,et al.  Mapping of decades-old underground coal mine workings using electrical resistivity tomography , 2022, Journal of Earth System Science.

[4]  G. Savard,et al.  Monitoring CO2 Injection at the CaMI Field Research Station Using Microseismic Noise Sources , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[5]  Hang Chen Exploring subsurface hydrology with electrical resistivity tomography , 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[6]  Xudong Zhu,et al.  Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography to Monitor the Evolution of Landslides' Safety Factors under Rainfall: A Feasibility Study Based on Numerical Simulation , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[7]  A. Prakash,et al.  Implication of Electrical Resistivity Tomography for Precise Demarcation of Pothole Subsidence Potential Zone Over Shallow Depth Coal Mine Workings , 2022, Journal of the Geological Society of India.

[8]  M. Jendryś,et al.  Assessment of Sinkhole Hazard in the Area of Shallow Mining Workings Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography , 2021, Energies.

[9]  J. Burghardt,et al.  4D Proxy Imaging of Fracture Dilation and Stress Shadowing Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography During High Pressure Injections Into a Dense Rock Formation , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[10]  D. Lawton,et al.  Semi-continuous electrical resistivity tomography monitoring for CO2 injection at the CaMI Field Research Station, Newell County, Alberta, Canada , 2021, First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy Expanded Abstracts.

[11]  S. Gödeke,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization study for groundwater exploration in the agricultural development areas of Brunei Darussalam , 2021, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[12]  B. Wiese,et al.  Development of an Electrical Resistivity Tomography Monitoring Concept for the Svelvik CO2 Field Lab, Norway , 2020 .

[13]  Daniel Nicolas Hofstadler,et al.  Riverine Sediment Changes and Channel Pattern of a Gravel-Bed Mountain Torrent , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[14]  T. Günther,et al.  Large-scale electrical resistivity tomography in the Cheb Basin (Eger Rift) at an International Continental Drilling Program (ICDP) monitoring site to image fluid-related structures , 2019, Solid Earth.

[15]  Chunyu Zhao,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Tomography optimization Based on Parallel Electrode Linear Back Projection Algorithm , 2019, 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC).

[16]  P. K. Champati ray,et al.  Integration of satellite remote sensing and geophysical techniques (electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar) for landslide characterization at Kunjethi (Kalimath), Garhwal Himalaya, India , 2019, Natural Hazards.

[17]  Bing Zhou Electrical Resistivity Tomography: A Subsurface-Imaging Technique , 2018, Applied Geophysics with Case Studies on Environmental, Exploration and Engineering Geophysics.

[18]  W. Al-fares,et al.  Integration of electrical resistivity tomography with electromagnetic and soil radon measurements for characterizing the leakage problem in Afamia B dam, Syria , 2018, Geofísica Internacional.

[19]  B. Wiese,et al.  Fully coupled inversion on a multi-physical reservoir model – Part II: The Ketzin CO2 storage reservoir , 2018, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.

[20]  A. Best,et al.  Experimental assessment of pore fluid distribution and geomechanical changes in saline sandstone reservoirs during and after CO2 injection , 2017 .

[21]  P. Bergmann,et al.  Fluid injection monitoring using electrical resistivity tomography — five years of CO2 injection at Ketzin, Germany , 2017 .

[22]  D. Morata,et al.  Resistivity distribution from mid-crustal conductor to near-surface across the 1200 km long Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault System, southern Chile , 2016 .

[23]  S. Srivastava,et al.  Near-surface high resolution imaging of a metallogenic zone in the northern fringe of Dalma volcanics in eastern India using electrical resistivity tomography , 2016 .

[24]  Yufei Tan,et al.  Model validation and stability analysis for operation projects in Jintan Salt Cavern for strategic oil storage of China , 2015 .

[25]  Oliver Kuras,et al.  Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method , 2013 .

[26]  Caroline Moraes,et al.  From conspicuous to considered fashion: A harm-chain approach to the responsibilities of luxury-fashion businesses , 2013 .

[27]  Alex Marcuello,et al.  Feasibility of Monitoring the Hontomín (Burgos, Spain) CO2 Storage Site Using a Deep EM Source , 2013, Surveys in Geophysics.

[28]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Bench-scale experiments to evaluate electrical resistivity tomography as a monitoring tool for geologic CO2 sequestration , 2012 .

[29]  Toshifumi Matsuoka,et al.  Experimental study on CO2 monitoring and quantification of stored CO2 in saline formations using resistivity measurements , 2010 .

[30]  Aria Abubakar,et al.  An enhanced Gauss-Newton inversion algorithm using a dual-optimal grid approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  D. Keyes,et al.  Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications , 2004 .

[32]  Yuguo Li,et al.  Three‐dimensional DC resistivity forward modelling using finite elements in comparison with finite‐difference solutions , 2002 .

[33]  Z. Bing,et al.  Finite element three-dimensional direct current resistivity modelling: accuracy and efficiency considerations , 2001 .

[34]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys , 1999 .

[35]  A. Apparao,et al.  DEPTH OF DETECTION OF BURIED CONDUCTIVE TARGETS WITH DIFFERENT ELECTRODE ARRAYS IN RESISTIVITY PROSPECTING , 1992 .

[36]  W. Daily,et al.  Cross-borehole resistivity tomography , 1991 .

[37]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger,et al.  CO2 Migration Monitoring by Means of Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – Review on Five Years of Operation of a Permanent ERT System at the Ketzin Pilot Site , 2014 .

[39]  Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) for Monitoring of CO2 Migration - from Tool Development to Reservoir Surveillance at the Ketzin Pilot Site , 2013 .

[40]  A. Binley,et al.  DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods , 2005 .