Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures.

When mobile organisms are spatially disoriented, for instance by rapid repetitive movement, they must re-establish orientation. Past research has shown that the geometry of enclosing spaces is consistently used for reorientation by a wide variety of species, but that non-geometric features are not always used. Based on these findings, some investigators have postulated a species-universal 'geometric module' that is transcended by the acquisition of spatial language at 6 years. This conclusion has been challenged, however, by findings that children as young as 18 months actually do use features to reorient in larger enclosures than those used in the original experiments. The reason for the room size effect is explored here in five experiments. Collectively, the data on age at which features are first used point to the importance of both restriction of movement in the small space and the fact that features are closer in the small space. In addition, success is seen at younger ages when the target object is adjacent to the feature. These results favor an adaptive combination model of spatial reorientation over a 'module-plus-language' view.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[2]  L. Acredolo Development of Spatial Orientation in Infancy. , 1978 .

[3]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  A. Vlasak The relative importance of global and local landmarks in navigation by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[7]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[8]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Explaining the Development of Spatial Reorientation , 2007 .

[9]  D F Sherry Cross-species comparisons. , 1997, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[10]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[11]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[13]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[14]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[16]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[18]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[19]  J. McComas,et al.  Children's Memory for Locations Visited: Importance of Movement and Choice. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  C. A. Castro,et al.  Spatial selectivity of rat hippocampal neurons: dependence on preparedness for movement. , 1989, Science.

[21]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[22]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  L. Acredolo,et al.  Developmental changes in the effects of landmarks on infant spatial behavior. , 1980 .

[25]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Development of Spatial Cognition , 2007 .

[26]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[27]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[28]  Marina Vasilyeva,et al.  Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[29]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning , 1971 .

[32]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  The Influence of Boundaries on Young Children's Searching and Gathering , 2001 .

[34]  N. Mackintosh The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .