A review of research into the development of radiologic expertise: implications for computer-based training.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Studies of radiologic error reveal high levels of variation between radiologists. Although it is known that experts outperform novices, we have only limited knowledge about radiologic expertise and how it is acquired. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review identifies three areas of research: studies of the impact of experience and related factors on the accuracy of decision-making; studies of the organization of expert knowledge; and studies of radiologists' perceptual processes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Interpreting evidence from these three paradigms in the light of recent research into perceptual learning and studies of the visual pathway has a number of conclusions for the training of radiologists, particularly for the design of computer-based learning programs that are able to illustrate the similarities and differences between diagnoses, to give access to large numbers of cases and to help identify weaknesses in the way trainees build up a global representation from fixated regions.

[1]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[2]  H L Kundel,et al.  Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. , 1972, Radiology.

[3]  Jules Sumkin,et al.  Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[4]  Fabrice Carrat,et al.  Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .

[7]  H L Kundel,et al.  Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[8]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[9]  Amilcare Gentili,et al.  Informatics in radiology: use of the MIRC DICOM service for clinical trials to automatically create teaching file cases from PACS. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  R. Glaser,et al.  Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. , 1988 .

[11]  C. Nodine,et al.  The Nature of Expertise in Radiology , 2000 .

[12]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  D Laming,et al.  Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms , 2000, Journal of medical screening.

[14]  J Roehrig,et al.  The manufacturer's perspective. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  C. Mello-Thoms Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[16]  R. Fitzgerald Error in radiology. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[17]  Alastair G. Gale,et al.  Diagnostic performance on briefly presented mammographic images , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[19]  Sven Haller,et al.  What is different about a radiologist's brain? , 2005, Radiology.

[20]  R. C. Murry,et al.  The effect of search time on perception. , 1981, Radiology.

[21]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Structured computer-based training in the interpretation of neuroradiological images , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[24]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Reader Variability in Mammography and Its Implications for Expected Utility over the Population of Readers and Cases , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[25]  R G Swensson,et al.  The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[26]  H. D'costa Observer variation in the detection of colorectal neoplasia on double-contrast barium enema: implications for colorectal cancer screening and training. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[27]  L R Brooks,et al.  Coordination of Analytic and Similarity-Based Processing Strategies and Expertise in Dermatological Diagnosis , 2001, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[28]  G. Norman Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends , 2005, Medical education.

[29]  S. Treue Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  T. Donovan,et al.  Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  E. Conant,et al.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. , 2007, Radiology.

[32]  Helen C. Cowley,et al.  Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  J M Brady,et al.  Digital mammography: a world without film? , 2005, Methods of information in medicine.

[34]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Les Irwig,et al.  Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.

[36]  J. S. Desmond,et al.  Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[37]  Takashi R Sato,et al.  Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Harold L. Kundel,et al.  Visual Search in Medical Images , 2000 .

[39]  C. Mello-Thoms,et al.  The perception of breast cancers-a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Observer variation in the evaluation of lumbar herniated discs and root compression: spiral CT compared with MRI. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[42]  E. Conant,et al.  How experience and training influence mammography expertise. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[43]  Nancy Franklin,et al.  Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Medicine: What's the Goal? , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[44]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[45]  Geoffrey R Norman,et al.  Using comprehensive feature lists to bias medical diagnosis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  J. Collins Medical education research: challenges and opportunities. , 2006, Radiology.

[47]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[49]  G R Norman,et al.  The Epistemology of Clinical Reasoning: Perspectives from Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[50]  J Brown,et al.  Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options , 1999, BMJ.

[51]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Clare Harries,et al.  Measuring Doctors' Self-insight into their Treatment Decisions , 2000 .

[53]  H L Kundel,et al.  Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. , 1975, Radiology.

[54]  Robert S. Wigton,et al.  Social Judgement Theory and Medical Judgement , 1996 .

[55]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[56]  A K Dixon,et al.  Training improves medical student performance in image interpretation. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[57]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[58]  A. Garnham,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning , 1994 .

[59]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Giving Learners the Best of Both Worlds: Do Clinical Teachers Need to Guard Against Teaching Pattern Recognition to Novices? , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[60]  Elizabeth Krupinski,et al.  Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.