Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition.

Emotion influences most aspects of cognition and behavior, but emotional factors are conspicuously absent from current models of word recognition. The influence of emotion on word recognition has mostly been reported in prior studies on the automatic vigilance for negative stimuli, but the precise nature of this relationship is unclear. Various models of automatic vigilance have claimed that the effect of valence on response times is categorical, an inverted U, or interactive with arousal. In the present study, we used a sample of 12,658 words and included many lexical and semantic control factors to determine the precise nature of the effects of arousal and valence on word recognition. Converging empirical patterns observed in word-level and trial-level data from lexical decision and naming indicate that valence and arousal exert independent monotonic effects: Negative words are recognized more slowly than positive words, and arousing words are recognized more slowly than calming words. Valence explained about 2% of the variance in word recognition latencies, whereas the effect of arousal was smaller. Valence and arousal do not interact, but both interact with word frequency, such that valence and arousal exert larger effects among low-frequency words than among high-frequency words. These results necessitate a new model of affective word processing whereby the degree of negativity monotonically and independently predicts the speed of responding. This research also demonstrates that incorporating emotional factors, especially valence, improves the performance of models of word recognition.

[1]  M. Masson.  A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .

[2]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[3]  S. Wood.  Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[4]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[5]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[6]  David P. Vinson,et al.  How does emotional content affect lexical processing? , 2013, CogSci.

[7]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  H. Baayen,et al.  Holistic Processing of Regular Four-word Sequences 1 HOLISTIC PROCESSING OF REGULAR FOUR-WORD SEQUENCES Holistic Processing of Regular Four-word Sequences : A Behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure , frequency , and probability on immediate free recall , 2009 .

[9]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Naveed A. Sheikh,et al.  Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: an eye-movement study. , 2013, Emotion.

[11]  James S. Adelman,et al.  Visual word recognition, volume 1 : models and methods, orthography and phonology , 2012 .

[12]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  Individual Differences in Visual Word Recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project , 2012 .

[14]  Pierre Courrieu,et al.  Accounting for Item Variance in Large-scale Databases , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[15]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Contextual Diversity, Not Word Frequency, Determines Word-Naming and Lexical Decision Times , 2006, Psychological science.

[17]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: a reevaluation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[19]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Evaluative priming of naming and semantic categorization responses revisited: a mutual facilitation explanation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Michelle Verges,et al.  Freeze or flee? Negative stimuli elicit selective responding , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[22]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  D. Carmel,et al.  Murder, She Wrote , 2009, Emotion.

[24]  S. Hains,et al.  Individual differences in word recognition latency , 1979 .

[25]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Z. Estes,et al.  Emotion Affects Similarity via Social Projection , 2012 .

[27]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.

[29]  Michael J. Cortese,et al.  Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[30]  J. Adelman,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). , 2008, Emotion.

[31]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Watch Out! That Could Be Dangerous: Valence-Arousal Interactions in Evaluative Processing , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[32]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[33]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[34]  R. Baayen,et al.  Quantitative Social Dialectology: Explaining Linguistic Variation Geographically and Socially , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general , 2008 .

[36]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .

[38]  R. Baayen,et al.  Analyzing Reaction Times , 2010 .

[39]  N. Lavie,et al.  Murder , She Wrote : Enhanced Sensitivity to Negative Word Valence , 2008 .

[40]  D. Algom,et al.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  D. Wentura,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Zachary Estes,et al.  The unexplained nature of reading. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming , 1999, Cognition.

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[48]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[49]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Dirk Hermans,et al.  Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[51]  David A Balota,et al.  Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. , 2006, Emotion.

[52]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Detecting inherent bias in lexical decision experiments with the LD1NN algorithm , 2011 .

[53]  Charles P. Thompson,et al.  Life is Pleasant—and Memory Helps to Keep it that Way! , 2003 .

[54]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[55]  M. Erdelyi.  A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. , 1974, Psychological review.

[56]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[58]  M. Yap,et al.  The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  S. Corkin,et al.  Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[63]  Laura Winther Balling,et al.  Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words , 2012, Cognition.

[64]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  Frequency effects in compound processing , 2010 .

[65]  J. Russell,et al.  Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[67]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[68]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[69]  David A. Balota,et al.  Not All Negative Words Slow Down Lexical Decision and Naming Speed: Importance of Word Arousal , 2008 .

[70]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  A. Anderson,et al.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Accentuate the Positive: Semantic Access in English Compounds , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[73]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. , 1990, Psychological review.

[74]  J. Forgas.  Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[76]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[77]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Positivity of the English Language , 2011, PloS one.

[78]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[79]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[80]  Sara C. Sereno,et al.  Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[81]  T. Sharot.  The optimism bias , 2011, Current Biology.

[82]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[83]  G. A. Kleef,et al.  How Emotions Regulate Social Life , 2009 .

[84]  T. Kahan,et al.  The role of valence and frequency in the emotional Stroop task , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[85]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Prominence in Triconstituent Compounds: Pitch Contours and Linguistic Theory , 2013, Language and speech.

[86]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[87]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Mood Congruity of Social Judgments , 1991 .

[88]  Graham G. Scott,et al.  Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal , 2013, Cognition.

[90]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[91]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[92]  J. Ouellette,et al.  Abandoning Unrealistic Optimism: Performance Estimates and the Temporal Proximity of Self-Relevant Feedback , 1996 .

[93]  Benjamin V. Tucker,et al.  Danger and usefulness are detected early in auditory lexical processing: Evidence from electroencephalography , 2012, Brain and Language.