GOING BEYOND TOTAL QUALITY: THE CHARACTERISTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND MEASURES OF LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS

The popular total quality management (TQM) approach has tended to focus on internal processes, rather than external issues such as competitiveness and market appeal, and is more reactive and adaptive than anticipative. The time has come to go beyond TQM and to understand the nature and application of organizational learning. Learning organizations envision change, are committed to generating and transferring new knowledge and innovation, and have learned how to learn. TQM may be embedded in the learning organization, but TQM is but the first step or wave in transforming and creating organizations which continuously expand their abilities to change and shape their futures. This article first defines and identifies the characteristics of a learning organization, then explores some techniques to develop and transform an organization into a learning organization, and finally suggests some traditional and newer techniques, such as data envelopment analysis (DEA), as ways to measure and evaluate organizational learning.

[1]  Daniel H. Kim The Link between individual and organizational learning , 1997 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[3]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  New paradigm organizations: From total quality to learning to world-class , 1994 .

[4]  Beth Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  An Assessment of the Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Service Friendliness , 1994 .

[5]  P. Senge,et al.  The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook , 1994 .

[6]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Academic departments efficiency via DEA , 1994, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Richard Tanner Pascale Intentional breakdowns and conflict by design , 1994 .

[8]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  New Work Systems and Skill Requirements. , 1994 .

[9]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  Mr. Learning Organization. , 1994 .

[10]  Chris Argyris Education for leading-learning , 1993 .

[11]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  A Comparison of Regression Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis as Alternative Methods for Performance Assessments , 1993 .

[12]  M. Maccoby The Human Side: To Create Quality, First Create the Culture , 1993 .

[13]  Dave Ulrich,et al.  High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capability , 1993 .

[14]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Unlearning the organization , 1993 .

[15]  Fred Kofman,et al.  Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations , 1993 .

[16]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[17]  M. Maccoby The Human Side: What Should Learning Organizations Learn? , 1993 .

[18]  M. Maccoby What Should Learning Organizations Learn , 1993 .

[19]  M. Schefczyk Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigms , 1993 .

[20]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Meeting the New Paradigm Challenges through Total Quality Management , 1993 .

[21]  P. Schoemaker MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[22]  M. Kiernan,et al.  The new strategic architecture: Learning to compete in the twenty-first century , 1993 .

[23]  C. Argyris On organizational learning , 1993 .

[24]  Philip B. Schary,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationships , 1992 .

[25]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[26]  Vicente Pina,et al.  EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE , 1992 .

[27]  F. Malerba Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change , 1992 .

[28]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR-efficiency of U.S. independent oil/gas producers over time , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  David Lei,et al.  Management practices in learning organizations , 1992 .

[30]  J. Sterman,et al.  Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future , 1992 .

[31]  Stephen Haag,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency of agricultural production units in the Blackland Prairie, Texas , 1992 .

[32]  Dan Dimancescu,et al.  The Seamless Enterprise: Making Cross-Functional Management Work , 1992 .

[33]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell , 1992 .

[34]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[35]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[36]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[37]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[38]  Eppen Gd,et al.  Bundling--new products, new markets, low risk. , 1991 .

[39]  R. Pascale Managing on the Edge , 1990 .

[40]  P. M. Milling,et al.  Computer-Based Management of Complex Systems , 1989 .

[41]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis for Managerial Control and Diagnosis , 1989 .

[42]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Organizational Learning: A New Challenge for System Dynamics , 1989 .

[43]  Daniel H. Kim Learning Laboratories: Designing a Reflective Learning Environment , 1989 .

[44]  Bent Erik Bakken Learning in dynamic simulation games; using performance as a measure , 1989 .

[45]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Application of Organizational Learning Theory to Japanese and American Management , 1986 .

[46]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[47]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[48]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Japanese Management: What About the “Hard” Skills? , 1985 .

[49]  Gareth Morgan,et al.  Action Learning: A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Social Change , 1984 .

[50]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[51]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[53]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[54]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[55]  Herbert A. Shepard,et al.  Innovation-Resisting and Innovation-Producing Organizations , 1967 .

[56]  W. Dill,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: OBSERVATIONS TOWARD A THEORY, , 1965 .

[57]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .