Learning to Read Vertical Text in Peripheral Vision

Purpose English-language text is almost always written horizontally. Text can be formatted to run vertically, but this is seldom used. Several studies have found that horizontal text can be read faster than vertical text in the central visual field. No studies have investigated the peripheral visual field. Studies have also concluded that training can improve reading speed in the peripheral visual field for horizontal text. We aimed to establish whether the horizontal vertical differences are maintained and if training can improve vertical reading in the peripheral visual field. Methods Eight normally sighted young adults participated in the first study. Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) reading speed was measured for horizontal and vertical text in the central visual field and at 10 degrees eccentricity in the upper or lower (horizontal text) and right or left (vertical text) visual fields. Twenty-one normally sighted young adults split equally between two training groups and one control group participated in the second study. Training consisted of RSVP reading using either vertical text in the left visual field or horizontal text in the inferior visual field. Subjects trained daily over 4 days. Pre- and post- horizontal and vertical RSVP reading speeds were carried out for all groups. For the training groups, these measurements were repeated 1 week and 1 month posttraining. Results Before training, RSVP reading speeds were faster for horizontal text in the central and peripheral visual fields when compared with vertical text. Training vertical reading improved vertical reading speeds by an average factor of 2.8. There was partial transfer of training to the opposite (right) hemifield. The training effects were retained for up to a month. Conclusions Rapid serial visual presentation training can improve RSVP vertical text reading in peripheral vision. These findings may have implications for patients with macular degeneration or hemianopic field loss.

[1]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[2]  J. Norman,et al.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[4]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading speed in the peripheral visual field of older adults: Does it benefit from perceptual learning? , 2010, Vision Research.

[5]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[6]  Ilpo Kojo,et al.  Reading vertical text from a computer screen , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  J. O'Regan Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[8]  Susana T. L. Chung Improving reading speed for people with central vision loss through perceptual learning. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Reading Vertical Text: Rotated VS. marquee , 2002 .

[12]  Michael T. Tolston,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Movement Constraints on Interpersonal Coordination and Communication , 2014 .

[13]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Reading Vertical and Horizontal Text in the Peripheral Visual Field , 2010 .

[14]  J. Sivak Optometry and vision science. , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  A Koriat,et al.  What is rotated in mental rotation? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration , 2007, Vision Research.

[18]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[19]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  E Peli,et al.  Control of eye movement with peripheral vision: implications for training of eccentric viewing. , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[21]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[22]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Learning Pop-out Detection: Specificities to Stimulus Characteristics , 1996, Vision Research.

[23]  Christopher D. Chambers,et al.  The role of feedback to foveal cortex in peripheral perception: ATMS study , 2010 .

[24]  M. Tinker,et al.  Perceptual and oculomotor efficiency in reading materials in vertical and horizontal arrangements. , 1955, American Journal of Psychology.

[25]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Training to improve reading speed in patients with juvenile macular dystrophy: a randomized study comparing two training methods , 2011, Acta ophthalmologica.

[26]  J. Norman,et al.  Reading rotated words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision. , 2013, Journal of Vision.

[28]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical reading speed , 2010 .

[29]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision , 2010, Vision Research.

[31]  W. C. Howell of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 2010 .

[32]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Learning to identify crowded letters: Does the learning depend on the frequency of training? , 2013, Vision Research.

[33]  Patricia Grant,et al.  Reading rehabilitation of individuals with AMD: relative effectiveness of training approaches. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  G. Legge,et al.  Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? , 2003, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.