Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits.

Yorkshire and Duroc litter records were used to estimate genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits. Two data sets with two subsets each were used to complete this study; 663 and 460 records included litter traits only, while 522 and 359 records also contained sow body weight for Yorkshires and Durocs, respectively. Heritability estimates for number born (NB), number born alive (NBA), total birth weight of live pigs (BWLIT), litter weight at 3 wk (WT3WK), sow weight at parturition (WTDAMPAR) and sow weight at weaning (WTDAMWN) were .24 +/- .14, .21 +/- .14, .42 +/- .16, .19 +/- .14, .72 +/- .21 and .42 +/- .18, respectively, for Yorkshires and .05 +/- .10, .04 +/- .10, .21 +/- .14, .25 +/- .15, .85 +/- .25 and .87 +/- .26, respectively, for the Durocs. Repeatability estimates for NB, NBA, BWLIT, WT3WK, WTDAMPAR and WTDAMWN were .13 +/- .06, .17 +/- .06, .27 +/- .06, .13 +/- .06, .64 +/- .05 and .54 +/- .05, respectively, for Yorkshires and .17 +/- .06, .21 +/- .06, .14 +/- .06, .17 +/- .06, .28 +/- .07 and .39 +/- .07, respectively, for Durocs. Genetic correlations among litter traits were high and positive in the Yorkshire data. Genetic correlations between NBA and WTDAMPAR, NBA and WTDAMWN, WT3WK and WTDAMPAR, and WT3WK and WTDAMWN were .37 +/- .25, .18 +/- .34, .60 +/- .29 and .29 +/- .45, respectively, in the Yorkshire data. Genetic correlations among litter traits in the Duroc analysis had large standard errors but were generally similar to the estimates obtained from the Yorkshire data. The genetic correlation between WTDAMPAR and WTDAMWN was .93 +/- .09 for Yorkshire sows. The primary conclusion from this study is that as selection increases sow productivity traits, there will be a positive correlated response in sow body weight.

[1]  E. J. Eisen,et al.  Postnatal maternal effects on growth and fat deposition in mice selected for large and small size. , 1981, Journal of animal science.

[2]  B. Bereskin,et al.  Some Genetic and Environmental Effects on Sow Productivity , 1981 .

[3]  E. J. Eisen,et al.  Effect of litter size at birth on lactation in mice. , 1980, Journal of animal science.

[4]  O. Vangen Studies on a two trait selection experiment in pigs. VI. Heritability estimates of reproductive traits. Influence of maternal effects. , 1980 .

[5]  Charles Smith,et al.  A note on the heritability of litter traits in pigs , 1979 .

[6]  L. A. Swiger,et al.  Selection for Increased Leanness of Yorkshire Swine. I. Experimental Procedures and Selection Applied , 1979 .

[7]  L. D. Young,et al.  Heritabilities and Genetic and Phenotypic Correlations for Prebreeding Traits, Reproductive Traits and Principal Components , 1978 .

[8]  R. Johnson,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE DEPENDENCY STRUCTURE BETWEEN A GILT'S PREBREEDING AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS. I. PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS , 1977 .

[9]  R. L. Baker,et al.  Selection for Litter Size in Mice , 1977 .

[10]  K. M. Irvin Genetic parameters and selection indexes for sow productivity , 1975 .

[11]  E. J. Eisen Direct and maternal genetic responses resulting from selection for 12-day litter weight in mice. , 1973, Canadian journal of genetics and cytology. Journal canadien de genetique et de cytologie.

[12]  E. J. Eisen Maternal effects on litter size in mice. , 1970 .

[13]  G. S. Strang,et al.  Litter productivity in Large White pigs. 2. Heritability and repeatability estimates. , 1970 .

[14]  V. A. Garwood,et al.  Genetic and environmental aspects of litter size in swine , 1966 .

[15]  L. A. Swiger,et al.  THE VARIANCE OF INTRACLASS CORRELATION INVOLVING GROUPS WITH ONE OBSERVATION , 1964 .

[16]  V. Hays How Well Do Your Pigs Measure Up , 1961 .

[17]  D. Falconer Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. , 1955, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[18]  L. M. Winters,et al.  The heritability of some factors affecting productivity of brood sows. , 1947, Journal of animal science.

[19]  H. A. Stewart An Appraisal of Factors Affecting Prolificacy in Swine , 1945 .