Structure, chemistry, and properties of mineral nanoparticles

STRUCTURE, CHEMISTRY AND PROPERTIES OF MINERAL NANOPARTICLES Glenn Waychunas 1 , Hengzong Zhang 2 and Ben Gilbert 1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Nanoparticle properties can depart markedly from their bulk analog materials, including large differences in chemical reactivity, molecular and electronic structure, and mechanical behavior. The greatest changes are expected at the smallest sizes, e.g. 10 nm and below, where surface effects are expected to dominate bonding, shape and energy considerations. The precise chemistry at nanoparticle interfaces can have a profound effect on structure, phase transformations, strain, and reactivity. Certain phases may exist only as nanoparticles, requiring transformations in chemistry, stoichiometry and structure with evolution to larger sizes. In general, mineralogical nanoparticles have been little studied. WHAT’S REALLY DIFFERENT ABOUT NANOPARTICLES Nanoparticles, particularly those with diameters of less than 10 nm, have a high proportion of atoms near their surfaces (ca. 16% for a 10 nm cube). Because of this, several important aspects of surfaces can drive deviations from bulk structure and chemistry at different size scales. Size also directly affects a number of other bulk properties due to restriction on wave function radius, separation of defects and interacting strain fields, the relative overall dominance of bulk or surface energy, and changes in vibrational properties. Studies of nanoparticles connect with several other important scientific areas dealing with lower

[1]  Y. Kayanuma,et al.  Quantum-size effects of interacting electrons and holes in semiconductor microcrystals with spherical shape. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[2]  G. Waychunas,et al.  Geometry of sorbed arsenate on ferrihydrite and crystalline FeOOH: Re-evaluation of EXAFS results and topological factors in predicting sorbate geometry, and evidence for monodentate complexes , 1995 .

[3]  S. Jain,et al.  Misfit strain and misfit dislocations in lattice mismatched epitaxial layers and other systems , 1997 .

[4]  Banfield,et al.  Imperfect oriented attachment: dislocation generation in defect-free nanocrystals , 1998, Science.

[5]  J. Banfield,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of phase stability of nanocrystalline titania , 1998 .

[6]  GIXAFS study of Fe3+ sorption and precipitation on natural quartz surfaces. , 1999, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[7]  K. Campbell,et al.  Mineralogical and textural changes accompanying ageing of silica sinter , 2000 .

[8]  Peter J. Eng,et al.  Structure of the Hydrated α-Al2O3 (0001) Surface , 2000 .

[9]  D. Rancourt Magnetism of Earth, Planetary, and Environmental Nanomaterials , 2001 .

[10]  Jillian F. Banfield,et al.  Nanoparticles in the Environment , 2001 .

[11]  G. Waychunas Structure, Aggregation and Characterization of Nanoparticles , 2001 .

[12]  J. Banfield,et al.  Water-driven structure transformation in nanoparticles at room temperature , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Polyhedral Shapes of CeO2 Nanoparticles , 2003 .

[14]  U Weierstall,et al.  Coherent X-ray diffractive imaging: applications and limitations. , 2003, Optics express.

[15]  Feng Huang,et al.  Nanoparticles: Strained and Stiff , 2004, Science.

[16]  M. Romanelli,et al.  Natural Fe-oxide and -oxyhydroxide nanoparticles: an EPR and SQUID investigation , 2005 .

[17]  J. Banfield,et al.  Nanoparticulate Iron Oxide Minerals in Soils and Sediments: Unique Properties and Contaminant Scavenging Mechanisms , 2005 .

[18]  P. Heaney,et al.  Kinetics of silica oligomerization and nanocolloid formation as a function of pH and ionic strength at 25°C , 2005 .

[19]  J. Weiss,et al.  Hall-petch law revisited in terms of collective dislocation dynamics. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[20]  A. Navrotsky,et al.  TiO2 Stability Landscape: Polymorphism, Surface Energy, and Bound Water Energetics , 2006 .

[21]  D. Suvorov,et al.  The influence of hydrothermal-reaction parameters on the formation of chrysotile nanotubes , 2006 .

[22]  Finite size effects of nanoparticles on the atomic pair distribution functions. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[23]  Huifang Xu,et al.  Modelling the effect of particle shape on the phase stability of ZrO2 nanoparticles , 2006 .

[24]  J. Catalano,et al.  Surface diffraction study of the hydrated hematite (1102) surface , 2007 .

[25]  Chang Q. Sun Size dependence of nanostructures: Impact of bond order deficiency , 2007 .

[26]  A. Kirkland,et al.  Electron nanodiffraction using sharply focused parallel probes , 2007 .

[27]  A. S. Konovalov,et al.  Simulation of the formation of nanorolls , 2007 .

[28]  Jinsheng Zheng,et al.  Oriented attachment kinetics for ligand capped nanocrystals: coarsening of thiol-PbS nanoparticles. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[29]  M. Schoonen,et al.  The Structure of Ferrihydrite, a Nanocrystalline Material , 2007, Science.

[30]  I. Chernyshova,et al.  Size-dependent structural transformations of hematite nanoparticles. 1. Phase transition. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[31]  Lianmao Peng,et al.  Structure of nanosized materials by high-energy X-ray diffraction: study of titanate nanotubes , 2007 .

[32]  J. Elliott,et al.  Atomistic simulations of calcite nanoparticles and their interaction with water. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Jian-Min Zuo,et al.  Coordination-dependent surface atomic contraction in nanocrystals revealed by coherent diffraction. , 2008, Nature materials.

[34]  A. Navrotsky,et al.  Size-Driven Structural and Thermodynamic Complexity in Iron Oxides , 2008, Science.

[35]  I. Robinson Coherent diffraction: giant molecules or tiny crystals? , 2008, Nature materials.

[36]  G. Waychunas,et al.  Structures and charging of alpha-alumina (0001)/water interfaces studied by sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.