Adverse Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development, Testing, and Findings of an NICU-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Harm in North American NICUs

OBJECTIVES. Currently there are few practical methods to identify and measure harm to hospitalized children. Patients in NICUs are at high risk and warrant a detailed assessment of harm to guide patient safety efforts. The purpose of this work was to develop a NICU-focused tool for adverse event detection and to describe the incidence of adverse events in NICUs identified by this tool. METHODS. A NICU-focused trigger tool for adverse event detection was developed and tested. Fifty patients from each site with a minimum 2-day NICU stay were randomly selected. All adverse events identified using the trigger tool were evaluated for severity, preventability, ability to mitigate, ability to identify the event earlier, and presence of associated occurrence report. Each trigger, and the entire tool, was evaluated for positive predictive value. Study chart reviewers, in aggregate, identified 88.0% of all potential triggers and 92.4% of all potential adverse events. RESULTS. Review of 749 randomly selected charts from 15 NICUs revealed 2218 triggers or 2.96 per patient, and 554 unique adverse events or 0.74 per patient. The positive predictive value of the trigger tool was 0.38. Adverse event rates were higher for patients <28 weeks' gestation and <1500 g birth weight. Fifty-six percent of all adverse events were deemed preventable; 16% could have been identified earlier, and 6% could have been mitigated more effectively. Only 8% of adverse events were identified in existing hospital-based occurrence reports. The most common adverse events identified were nosocomial infections, catheter infiltrates, and abnormal cranial imaging. CONCLUSIONS. Adverse event rates in the NICU setting are substantially higher than previously described. Many adverse events resulted in permanent harm and the majority were classified as preventable. Only 8% were identified using traditional voluntary reporting methods. Our NICU-focused trigger tool appears efficient and effective at identifying adverse events.

[1]  S D Small,et al.  The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[2]  N. Laird,et al.  Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention , 1995 .

[3]  Stuart Lipsitz,et al.  The Reliability of Medical Record Review for Estimating Adverse Event Rates , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Research Paper: Identifying Adverse Drug Events: Development of a Computer-based Monitor and Comparison with Chart Review and Stimulated Voluntary Report , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  N. Laird,et al.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events , 1995 .

[7]  Anne Elixhauser,et al.  Patient safety events during pediatric hospitalizations. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[8]  D. Classen,et al.  Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[9]  Sigal Kaplan,et al.  Reported adverse drug events in infants and children under 2 years of age. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[10]  T. Brennan,et al.  INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS , 2008 .

[11]  Marlene R. Miller,et al.  Pediatric patient safety in hospitals: a national picture in 2000. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[12]  R. Resar,et al.  Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[13]  Jeffrey D Horbar,et al.  Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[14]  T. Brennan,et al.  Adverse Events and Preventable Adverse Events in Children , 2005, Pediatrics.

[15]  R S Evans,et al.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients* , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[16]  John Taylor.  Pediatric Patient Safety in Hospitals: A National Picture in 2000Miller MR, Zhan C (Johns-Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, Md; Ctr for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Rockville, Md) Pediatrics 113:1741–1746, 2004§ , 2006 .

[17]  P. Maurette,et al.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[18]  Jill G Joseph,et al.  Hospital-reported medical errors in children. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[19]  T. Brennan,et al.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. , 2000, Medical care.

[20]  R. Raschke,et al.  A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. , 1998, JAMA.