iTRAQ‐based quantitative analysis of protein mixtures with large fold change and dynamic range

Quantitation of changes in protein abundance is key to understanding the alterations that biological systems undergo and to discovering novel biomarkers. Currently, HPLC‐MS/MS can be used to quantify changes in protein expression levels [Ong, S. E. and Mann, M., Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 252–262]. Nevertheless, quantitative analysis of protein mixtures by HPLC‐MS/MS is still hampered by the wide range of protein expression levels, the high dynamic range of protein concentrations and the lack of reliable quantitation algorithms [D'Ascenzo, M., et al. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2008, 7, 127–135; Lin, W. T., et al., J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2328–2338; Matthiesen, R., et al. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 2338–2347; Yu, C. Y., et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W707–W712]. In this context, we describe two different samples (4‐protmix and 8‐protmix) suitable for relative protein quantitation using iTRAQ. Using the 4‐protmix, relative protein changes of up to 24‐fold were measured. The 8‐protmix allowed the quantitation of the relative protein changes in a mixture of proteins within the range of two orders of magnitude in concentration and ten‐fold differences in relative abundance. We propose that the two samples are suited to test the iTRAQ quantitative proteomic workflow. We analyzed the iTRAQ samples with a LTQ Orbitrap using “higher energy collision‐induced dissociation” fragmentation [Olsen, J. V., et al., Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 709–712] and quantified with Proteome Discoverer v.1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We believe that the presented protein mixtures will be useful to assess the performance of the iTRAQ‐based quantitation proteomic strategy in any laboratory.

[1]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Proteome-wide cellular protein concentrations of the human pathogen Leptospira interrogans , 2009, Nature.

[2]  Crispin J. Miller,et al.  Eight-channel iTRAQ Enables Comparison of the Activity of Six Leukemogenic Tyrosine Kinases*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  S. Sreevatsan,et al.  Biomarker Discovery in Subclinical Mycobacterial Infections of Cattle , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Akhilesh Pandey,et al.  A quantitative proteomic approach for identification of potential biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  B. Prieto,et al.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of human endometrial fluid aspirate. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[7]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  Sándor Pongor,et al.  Fragmentation pathways of NG-methylated and unmodified arginine residues in peptides studied by ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-MS , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[9]  T. Colgan,et al.  Multiple reaction monitoring of mTRAQ-labeled peptides enables absolute quantification of endogenous levels of a potential cancer marker in cancerous and normal endometrial tissues. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  Timothy J Griffin,et al.  iTRAQ reagent-based quantitative proteomic analysis on a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[11]  M. Mann,et al.  Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis , 2007, Nature Methods.

[12]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.